ArticleThe New phytologist2025
A test of the Grant-Stebbins pollinator-shift model of floral evolution.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Most Effective Pollinators Predict Intraspecific Floral Color Diversity Across an Edaphic Matrix.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Ecological change may be a common initiator of evolutionary pollinator shifts.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Pollination by long-proboscid horseflies and its implications for reproductive isolation among coflowering Satyrium orchids in South Africa.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Testing macroevolutionary predictions of the Grant-Stebbins model in the origin of Aeschynanthus acuminatus.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Trait-Mediated Variation in Plant Interactive Roles Within Plant-Floral Visitor Networks.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ecological niche differentiation mediates near complete premating reproductive isolation within the Gladiolus carneus (Iridaceae) species complex.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Geographical variation in flower colour of a food-deceptive orchid reflects local pollinator preferences.Annals of botany · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pollinators are thought to play a key role in driving incipient speciation within the angiosperms. However, the mechanisms underlying floral divergence in plants with generalist pollination systems, remains understudied. Brunsvigia gregaria displays significant geographical variation in floral traits and are visited by diverse pollinator communities. Because pollinators are often shared between populations, we investigated whether specific pollinators are responsible for driving floral divergence between them. Three distinct ecotypes were identified, each dominated by three different pollinators: bees, swallowtail butterflies, and long-proboscid flies. Across seven populations, we found a pattern of association between style length and the morphology of pollinators that visit the flowers most frequently and contact the reproductive parts most often. Furthermore, we found significant linear, quadratic and correlational selection on flower number, tepal length and style length within the butterfly- and bee-dominated populations. We also found partial evidence for divergent selection on these traits between experimental sites. Our findings suggest that a handful of key pollinators that vary in their importance have the potential to drive population-level divergence in floral traits, which may lead to pollination ecotype formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.