Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794274›Full record

ArticleRMD open2024

Large language models for accurate disease detection in electronic health records: the examples of crystal arthropathies.

Nils Bürgisser, Etienne Chalot, Samia Mehouachi, Clement P Buclin, Kim Lauper, Delphine S Courvoisier, Denis Mongin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nils BürgisserDivision of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland nburgisser@proton.me.ORCID 0009-0007-3375-1985
Etienne ChalotInformation Systems Directorate, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Samia MehouachiDivision of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Clement P BuclinDivision of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kim LauperDivision of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-9009
Delphine S CourvoisierDivision of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1956-2607
Denis MonginDivision of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-8395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe propose and test a framework to detect disease diagnosis using a recent large language model (LLM), Meta's Llama-3-8B, on French-language electronic health record (EHR) documents. Specifically, it focuses on detecting gout ('goutte' in French), a ubiquitous French term that has multiple meanings beyond the disease. The study compares the performance of the LLM-based framework with traditional natural language processing techniques and tests its dependence on the parameter used.

methodsThe framework was developed using a training and testing set of 700 paragraphs assessing 'gout' from a random selection of EHR documents from a tertiary university hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. All paragraphs were manually reviewed and classified by two healthcare professionals into disease (true gout) and non-disease (gold standard). The LLM's accuracy was tested using few-shot and chain-of-thought prompting and compared with a regular expression (regex)-based method, focusing on the effects of model parameters and prompt structure. The framework was further validated on 600 paragraphs assessing 'Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease (CPPD)'.

resultsThe LLM-based algorithm outperformed the regex method, achieving a 92.7% (88.7%-95.4%) positive predictive value, a 96.6% (94.6%-97.8%) negative predictive value and an accuracy of 95.4% (93.6%-96.7%) for gout. In the validation set on CPPD, accuracy was 94.1% (90.2%-97.6%). The LLM framework performed well over a wide range of parameter values.

conclusionLLMs accurately detected disease diagnoses from EHRs, even in non-English languages. They could facilitate creating large disease registers in any language, improving disease care assessment and patient recruitment for clinical trials.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectronic Health RecordsGoutLarge Language ModelsHumansRegistriesSensitivity and SpecificityChondrocalcinosisCrystal arthropathiesGoutMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID39794274
PMCPMC11664341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.