ArticleAnais brasileiros de dermatologia
Risankizumab and guselkumab for psoriasis: a 1-year real-world practice indirect comparison.
Article in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the global research landscape of risankizumab: a decade (2016-2025) of multi-database bibliometric analysis and emerging frontiers.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- A 76-week real-world multidimensional analysis of guselkumab in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a retrospective cohort study based on Chinese clinical practice standards.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- IL-23 Inhibitors in Psoriasis: What Have We Learnt so Far?Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a genetic predisposition and autoimmune component, often treated with immunomodulators such as biologic therapies.
objectivesIn this study, the authors evaluated the effectiveness and safety of two of these over a 52-week treatment period.
methodsA double-center retrospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who received either guselkumab or risankizumab at dermatology clinics for a minimum of 52-weeks.
resultOut of the 90 patients enrolled in the study, 49 (54.4%) received guselkumab, while 41 (45.6%) received risankizumab. Regarding therapy efficiency, there was no statistically significant difference in PASI90 and PASI100 at week 4 between the two groups (p = 0.428, p = 0.750, respectively). By week 16, PASI90 responses were higher in the guselkumab group (p = 0.039). However, there was no difference in PASI100 response at week 16 (p = 0.957). At weeks 24 and 52, PASI90 and PASI100 responses were similar in both groups. Our results demonstrated that both guselkumab and risankizumab were effective in patients who had previously failed other biologics. Clinical outcomes in both the guselkumab and risankizumab groups had remained unaffected during prior biologic treatments, including anti-TNF, anti-IL17, and/or anti-IL12/23. Treatments yielded consistent outcomes regardless of factors such as obesity, gender, and comorbidities. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The small sample size.
conclusionsOur results demonstrated that both guselkumab and risankizumab were effective in patients who had previously failed other biologics. Clinical outcomes in both the guselkumab and risankizumab groups had remained unaffected during prior biologic treatments, including anti-TNF, anti-IL17, and/or anti-IL12/23. Treatments yielded consistent outcomes regardless of factors such as obesity, gender, and comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.