Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794133›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025

Improving the Robustness of Deep Learning Models in Predicting Hematoma Expansion from Admission Head CT.

Anh T Tran, Gaby Abou Karam, Dorin Zeevi, Adnan I Qureshi, Ajay Malhotra, Shahram Majidi, Santosh B Murthy, Soojin Park, Despina Kontos, Guido J Falcone and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anh T TranFrom the Department of Radiology (A.T.T., D.Z., S.P.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Gaby Abou KaramDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.T.T., G.A.K., D.Z., A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3540-7185
Dorin ZeeviFrom the Department of Radiology (A.T.T., D.Z., S.P.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Adnan I QureshiZeenat Qureshi Stroke Institute and Department of Neurology (A.I.Q.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4962-540X
Ajay MalhotraDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.T.T., G.A.K., D.Z., A.M.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9223-6640
Shahram MajidiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (S.M.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2971-6216
Santosh B MurthyDepartment of Neurology (S.B.M.), Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York.
Soojin ParkDepartment of Neurology (S.P., D.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Despina KontosDepartment of Neurology (S.P., D.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Guido J FalconeDepartment of Neurology (G.J.F. K.N.S.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Kevin N ShethDepartment of Neurology (G.J.F. K.N.S.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2003-5473
Seyedmehdi PayabvashFrom the Department of Radiology (A.T.T., D.Z., S.P.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York Sam.payabvash@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4628-0370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRobustness against input data perturbations is essential for deploying deep learning models in clinical practice. Adversarial attacks involve subtle, voxel-level manipulations of scans to increase deep learning models' prediction errors. Testing deep learning model performance on examples of adversarial images provides a measure of robustness, and including adversarial images in the training set can improve the model's robustness. In this study, we examined adversarial training and input modifications to improve the robustness of deep learning models in predicting hematoma expansion (HE) from admission head CTs of patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used a multicenter cohort of

resultsWhen deep learning models trained solely on clean scans were tested with PGD and FGSM adversarial images, the average HE prediction AUC decreased from 0.8 to 0.67 and 0.71, respectively. Overall, the best performing strategy to improve model robustness was training with 5:3 mix of clean and PGD adversarial scans and addition of Otsu multithreshold segmentation to model input, increasing the average AUC to 0.77 against both PGD and FGSM adversarial attacks. Adversarial training with FGSM improved robustness against similar type attack but offered limited cross-attack robustness against PGD-type images.

conclusionsAdversarial training and inclusion of threshold-based segmentation as an additional input can improve deep learning model robustness in prediction of HE from admission head CTs in acute ICH.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageDeep LearningHematomaTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID39794133
PMCPMC12453420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.