ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Improving the Robustness of Deep Learning Models in Predicting Hematoma Expansion from Admission Head CT.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strategies to Improve the Robustness and Generalizability of Deep Learning Segmentation and Classification in Neuroimaging.BioMedInformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeRobustness against input data perturbations is essential for deploying deep learning models in clinical practice. Adversarial attacks involve subtle, voxel-level manipulations of scans to increase deep learning models' prediction errors. Testing deep learning model performance on examples of adversarial images provides a measure of robustness, and including adversarial images in the training set can improve the model's robustness. In this study, we examined adversarial training and input modifications to improve the robustness of deep learning models in predicting hematoma expansion (HE) from admission head CTs of patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe used a multicenter cohort of
resultsWhen deep learning models trained solely on clean scans were tested with PGD and FGSM adversarial images, the average HE prediction AUC decreased from 0.8 to 0.67 and 0.71, respectively. Overall, the best performing strategy to improve model robustness was training with 5:3 mix of clean and PGD adversarial scans and addition of Otsu multithreshold segmentation to model input, increasing the average AUC to 0.77 against both PGD and FGSM adversarial attacks. Adversarial training with FGSM improved robustness against similar type attack but offered limited cross-attack robustness against PGD-type images.
conclusionsAdversarial training and inclusion of threshold-based segmentation as an additional input can improve deep learning model robustness in prediction of HE from admission head CTs in acute ICH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.