Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794127›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Temporally Dissociable Neural Representations of Pitch Height and Chroma.

Andrew Chang, David Poeppel, Xiangbin Teng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew ChangDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003 ac8888@nyu.edu xiangbinteng@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0001-6745-4435
David PoeppelDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.ORCID 0000-0003-0184-163X
Xiangbin TengDepartment of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, China ac8888@nyu.edu xiangbinteng@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0001-5360-4957

Funding

The role of amplitude modulation in perceiving speech and musicF32DC018205 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, ANDREW · 2019 to 2023
$235k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC018205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraction and analysis of pitch underpin speech and music recognition, sound segregation, and other auditory tasks. Perceptually, pitch can be represented as a helix composed of two factors: height monotonically aligns with frequency, while chroma cyclically repeats at doubled frequencies. Although the early perceptual and neurophysiological mechanisms for extracting pitch from acoustic signals have been extensively investigated, the equally essential subsequent stages that bridge to high-level auditory cognition remain less well understood. How does the brain represent perceptual attributes of pitch at higher-order processing stages, and how are the neural representations formed over time? We used a machine learning approach to decode time-resolved neural responses of human listeners (10 females and 7 males) measured by magnetoencephalography across different pitches, hypothesizing that different pitches sharing similar neural representations would result in reduced decoding performance. We show that pitch can be decoded from lower-frequency neural responses within auditory-frontal cortical regions. Specifically, linear mixed-effects modeling reveals that height and chroma explain the decoding performance of delta band (0.5-4 Hz) neural activity at distinct latencies: a long-lasting height effect precedes a transient chroma effect, followed by a recurrence of height after chroma, indicating sequential processing stages associated with unique perceptual and neural characteristics. Furthermore, the localization analyses of the decoder demonstrate that height and chroma are associated with overlapping cortical regions, with differences observed in the right orbital and polar frontal cortex. The data provide a perspective motivating new hypotheses on the mechanisms of pitch representation.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexPitch PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetoencephalographyMaleYoung Adultauditory perceptiondecodingmachine learningmagnetoencephalography (MEG)octave equivalencerepresentational similarity analysis

Identifiers

PMID39794127
PMCPMC11841769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.