Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39793059›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Collaborative management partnerships strongly decreased deforestation in the most at-risk protected areas in Africa since 2000.

Sébastien Desbureaux, Ibrahim Kabore, Giulia Vaglietti, Mujon Baghai, Peter Lindsey, Ashley Robson, Philippe Delacote, Antoine Leblois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Managing protected areas takes a village.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Collaborative management partnerships strongly decreased deforestation in the most at-risk protected areas in Africa since 2000.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sébastien DesbureauxCenter for Environmental Economics - Montpellier (Univ Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro), Montpellier 34000, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-4917
Ibrahim KaboreEquipe D'Economie - le Havre Normandie, Université Le Havre Normandie), Le Havre 76063, France.ORCID 0009-0002-7462-0969
Giulia VagliettiClimate Economics Chair, Paris 75002, France.
Mujon BaghaiIndependent Consultant, Santa Monica, CA 90402.ORCID 0000-0002-8814-6842
Peter LindseyLion Recovery Fund, Wildlife Conservation Network, Harare 0002, Zimbabwe.
Ashley RobsonInstitute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa, Department of Biological Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.
Philippe DelacoteClimate Economics Chair, Paris 75002, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9888-7193
Antoine LebloisCenter for Environmental Economics - Montpellier (Univ Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro), Montpellier 34000, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0504-884X

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) CPJ POLCBDLabex Arbre NR-11- LABX-0002-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaborative management partnerships (CMPs) between state wildlife authorities and nonprofit conservation organizations to manage protected areas (PAs) have been used increasingly across Sub-Saharan Africa since the 2000s. They aim to attract funding, build capacity, and increase the environmental effectiveness of PAs. Our study documents the rise of CMPs, examines their current extent, and measures their effectiveness in protecting habitats. We combine statistical matching and Before-After-Control-Intervention regressions to quantify the impact of CMPs, using tree cover loss as a proxy. We identify 127 CMPs located in 16 countries. CMPs are more often located in remote PAs, with habitats that are least threatened by human activity. Our results indicate that, on average, each year in a CMP results in an annual decrease in tree cover loss of about 55% compared to PAs without CMPs. Where initial anthropogenic pressure was low, we measure no effect. Where it was high, we see a 66% decrease in tree cover loss. This highly heterogeneous effect illustrates the importance of moving beyond average effect size when assessing conservation interventions, as well as the need for policy makers to invest public funds to protect the areas the most at risk.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAfricaAfrica South of the SaharaHumansTreescollaborative management partnershipsdeforestationgovernanceprotected areasSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID39793059
PMCPMC11725833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.