ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Oppositional and competitive instigation of hippocampal synaptic plasticity by the VTA and locus coeruleus.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task-irrelevant stimuli robustly drive phasic pupil-linked arousal but only weakly affect memory formation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Molecular Machinery of Synaptic Plasticity and Its Potential Role in the Aetiology of Schizophrenia.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- β-adrenergic receptors modulate CA1 population coding and synaptic plasticity during cumulative spatial memory formation and updating.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Strain- and age-dependent divergence in mouse appetitive spatial learning and decision strategies.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Discrete and differentiated encoding of distinct components of spatial experience occurs within the proximodistal subfields of the dorsoventral axis of the hippocampus.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Optogenetic stimulation of midbrain dopaminergic neurons rescues hippocampal synaptic plasticity deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Functional and Regional Specificity of Noradrenergic Signaling for Encoding and Retrieval of Associative Recognition Memory in the Rat.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Locus coeruleus-related insula activation supports implicit learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The Modulation by the Locus Coeruleus of Recent and Remote Memory Retrieval is Activity-Dependent.Hippocampus · 2025Article
- Oppositional and competitive instigation of hippocampal synaptic plasticity by the VTA and locus coeruleus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Multiplexed detection of nuclear immediate early gene expression reveals hippocampal neuronal subpopulations that engage in the acquisition and updating of spatial experience.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The novelty, saliency, and valency of ongoing experiences potently influence the firing rate of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the locus coeruleus (LC). Associative experience, in turn, is recorded into memory by means of hippocampal synaptic plasticity that is regulated by noradrenaline sourced from the LC, and dopamine, sourced from both the VTA and LC. Two persistent forms of synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation (LTP), and long-term depression (LTD) support the encoding of different kinds of spatial experience. To what extent the VTA and the LC influence the direction of change of synaptic plasticity and therefore the content of stored experience is not clear. Here, we report that test-pulse activation of Schaffer-collateral-CA1 synapses of freely behaving male rats, in conjunction with VTA stimulation, results in LTP (>24 h), whereas concomitant hippocampal afferent and LC stimulation results in LTD (>24 h). Effects are frequency-dependent (1 to 50 Hz) and competitive: high-frequency (25 Hz), but not low-frequency (5 Hz) optogenetic activation of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive (TH+) neurons in the VTA, results in D1/D5R-dependent LTP, whereas 5 Hz (but not 1, or 25 Hz) activation of TH+ neurons in the LC results in hippocampal LTD that is both D1/D5 and β-AR-dependent. These results suggest that the VTA and LC do not work in synergy, but rather function in a competing fashion to drive different forms of information encoding through synaptic plasticity. Our findings indicate that information transmitted by the VTA and LC is likely to play a decisive role in the shaping of hippocampal information storage and the nature of learned experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.