ReviewEuropean thyroid journal2025
[18F]Tetrafluoroborate, a new NIS PET/CT radiopharmaceutical: an overview focused on differentiated thyroid cancer.
Review in European thyroid journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NIS-Centered Reporter Gene Imaging and Radionuclide-Integrated Nanoplatforms for Quantitative Tracking of Immune Cell Therapy in Oncology and Inflammatory Disease Models.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In relapsing differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), the in vivo evaluation of natrium-iodide symporter (NIS) expression is pivotal in the therapeutic planning and is achieved by 131/123Iodine (131/123I) whole body scan. However, these approaches have low sensitivity due to the low resolution of SPECT. 18F-Tetrafluoroborate (TFB) has been proposed as a viable alternative, which could outperform 131/123I scans owing to the superior PET resolution. We have reviewed the literature to collect the available data on TFB diagnostic performance and compare it with the standard methods. Methods: Two authors searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science and the web for studies evaluating the biodistribution and dosimetry of TFB in patients with DTC. General characteristics, technical parameters, procedures' sensitivities and standards of reference were extracted from the selected studies. The risk of bias was evaluated with the QUADAS-2 scoring system. Results: Five studies were included in the review. Two analysed TFB's biodistribution and dosimetry, while the other three assessed its diagnostic performance. The diagnostic comparators were 18F-FDG PET/CT (all cases), 124I-PET/CT (one study) and diagnostic/therapeutic 131I-SPECT/CT (one study each). TFB performed better than 131I; the TFB and 18F-FDG PET/CT combination achieved the best sensitivity. TFB delivered significantly less dose than the other NIS tracers. Conclusion: TFB is a promising tracer in relapsing DTC, showing higher sensitivity and less radiation exposure than the standard methods. The TFB and 18F-FDG combination appears particularly intriguing, especially when disease heterogeneity is suspected. However, data are still sparse and need to be confirmed by further investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.