Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792917›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Enhancing semantical text understanding with fine-tuned large language models: A case study on Quora Question Pair duplicate identification.

Sifei Han, Lingyun Shi, Fuchiang Rich Tsui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sifei HanDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Tsui Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3281-5955
Lingyun ShiDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Tsui Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Fuchiang Rich TsuiDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Tsui Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6383-8471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semantical text understanding holds significant importance in natural language processing (NLP). Numerous datasets, such as Quora Question Pairs (QQP), have been devised for this purpose. In our previous study, we developed a Siamese Convolutional Neural Network (S-CNN) that achieved an F1 score of 82.02% (95% C.I.: 81.83%-82.20%). Given the growing attention toward large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, we aimed to explore their effectiveness in text similarity tasks. In this research, we leveraged 5 pretrained LLMs, conducted various fine-tuning approaches (prompt engineering, n-shot learning, and supervised learning using the low-rank adaptation [LoRA]), and compared their performance using F1 score. To ensure a fair comparison, we followed our previous study's design and dataset by employing a 10-fold cross-validation for supervised model training and evaluation. Additionally, we conducted a secondary study by introducing a recent larger LLM with 70B parameters and comparing it with the 7B model using the GLUE benchmark, and both models were finetuned with the corpus. The fine-tuned LLaMA model with 7B parameters (qLLaMA_LoRA-7B) using 100,000 QQP corpus yielded the best results, achieving an F1 score of 84.9% (95% C.I.: 84.13%-85.67%), which outperformed the Alpaca_LoRA-65B (finetuned based on LLaMA-65B) (F1: 64.98% [64.72%-65.25%]; P<0.01) and had a 3% improvement compared to our previously published best model, S-CNN. The finetuned LLaMA3.1-70B (qLLaMA3.1_LoRA-70B) with 70B parameters (F1: 74.4%) outperformed the qLLaMA_LoRA-7B (F1: 71.9%) using the GLUE benchmark. The study demonstrated an effective LLM finetuning framework, which highlights the importance of finetuning LLMs for improved performance. Our task-specific supervised finetuning demonstrated improved LLM performance compared to larger pretrained models with or without n-shot learning; moreover, finetuning a larger LLM further improved performance compared to finetuning a smaller LLM. Our LLM-based finetuning framework may potentially improve various document similarity tasks, such as matching resumes with job descriptions, recommending subject-matter experts, or identifying potential reviewers for grant proposals or manuscript submissions.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, ComputerHumansLanguageSemantics

Identifiers

PMID39792917
PMCPMC11723592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.