Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792836›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Are we ready for self-sampling for cervical cancer screening? Insights from service providers and policy makers in Nepal.

Saki Thapa, Amit Timilsina, Bikram Bucha, Swastika Shrestha, Safal Kunwar, Raghu Dhital, Gillian Holdsworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saki ThapaResearch Department, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1398-0515
Amit TimilsinaResearch and Community Development Center, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bikram BuchaResearch Department, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7218-6237
Swastika ShresthaResearch Department, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7291-538X
Safal KunwarResearch Department, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0553-1756
Raghu DhitalResearch Department, Birat Nepal Medical Trust (BNMT), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Gillian HoldsworthBritain Nepal Medical Trust, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK), London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the leading cancer among women in Nepal, but the country has very low screening rate, with only 8.2% of women being screened. In recent years, a self-sampling kit for testing for the human papillomavirus (HPV) has been developed to allow self-sampling and enable early detection of cervical abnormalities. This kit enables women to collect cervical samples without the need for trained healthcare providers or healthcare facilities. Nevertheless, there has been a notable absence of scientific studies to analyse the feasibility and acceptability of self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in Nepal, particularly from the perspective of various service providers. The qualitative research method used semi-structured in-depth interviews and key informant interviews with healthcare providers, online service providers, and policymakers. These interviews were conducted in person with 20 participants until data saturation was achieved. Thematic analysis was performed where the translated data was coded inductively using NVivo 12. The majority of the participants identified the self-sampling method as an alternative sampling option for detection of cervical abnormalities/cancer in Nepal. Barriers to self-sampling included a low level of knowledge and information, the cost of the self-sampling kit, unclear information regarding self-sampling process and concerns about inaccurate results among women and girls, who are the end users. Similarly, factors such as knowledge and information regarding the self-sampling technique, accessibility of available services and information, and national self-care guidelines and policies for cervical cancer screening were identified as facilitators for self-sampling. It is crucial to have evidence-based discussions, especially regarding the effectiveness of a self-care approach in cervical cancer screening and help create a supportive policy environment for implementing self-care strategies in Nepal. Furthermore, disseminating education and information nationwide through campaigns to raise awareness about self-sampling is essential among beneficiaries for the scaling up of self-sampling for cervical cancer in Nepal.

Identifiers

PMID39792836
PMCPMC11723589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.