ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting the polyspecificity of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase for non-canonical amino acids using molecular dynamics simulation and MM/PBSA.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advancement of genetic code expansion, the field is progressing towards incorporating multiple non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs). The specificity of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) towards ncAAs is a critical factor, as engineered aaRSs frequently show polyspecificity, complicating the precise incorporation of multiple ncAAs. To address this challenge, predicting binding affinity can be beneficial. In this study, we expressed sfGFP using an orthogonal aaRS/tRNA pair with 4-Azido-L-phenylalanine (AzF) and another four different ncAAs. The experimental results showed specificity with O-Methyl-L-tyrosine as well as AzF, and these results were compared with computational predictions. We constructed a mutant aaRS structure specific for AzF through homology modelling and conducted docking studies with tyrosine and five ncAAs, followed by molecular dynamics simulations. The binding affinity was calculated using the molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area, focusing on nonpolar solvation terms. While the analysis is based on the incorporation of limited number of ncAAs, the cavity and dispersion term method showed consistency with experimental data, highlighting its potential utility compared to the surface area term method. These findings enhance understanding of the ncAA specificity of aaRS in relation to computer simulations and energy calculations, which can be utilized to rationally design or predict the specificity of aaRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.