ArticlePloS one2025
Effects of spectral manipulations of music mixes on musical scene analysis abilities of hearing-impaired listeners.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Music pre-processing methods are currently becoming a recognized area of research with the goal of making music more accessible to listeners with a hearing impairment. Our previous study showed that hearing-impaired listeners preferred spectrally manipulated multi-track mixes. Nevertheless, the acoustical basis of mixing for hearing-impaired listeners remains poorly understood. Here, we assess listeners' ability to detect a musical target within mixes with varying degrees of spectral manipulations using the so-called EQ-transform. This transform exaggerates or downplays the spectral distinctiveness of a track with respect to an ensemble average spectrum taken over a number of instruments. In an experiment, 30 young normal-hearing (yNH) and 24 older hearing-impaired (oHI) participants with predominantly moderate to severe hearing loss were tested. The target that was to be detected in the mixes was from the instrument categories Lead vocals, Bass guitar, Drums, Guitar, and Piano. Our results show that both hearing loss and target category affected performance, but there were no main effects of EQ-transform. yNH performed consistently better than oHI in all target categories, irrespective of the spectral manipulations. Both groups demonstrated the best performance in detecting Lead vocals, with yNH performing flawlessly at 100% median accuracy and oHI at 92.5% (IQR = 86.3-96.3%). Contrarily, performance in detecting Bass was arguably the worst among yNH (Mdn = 67.5% IQR = 60-75%) and oHI (Mdn = 60%, IQR = 50-66.3%), with the latter even performing close to chance-levels of 50% accuracy. Predictions from a generalized linear mixed-effects model indicated that for every decibel increase in hearing loss level, the odds of correctly detecting the target decreased by 3%. Therefore, baseline performance progressively declined to chance-level at moderately severe degrees of hearing loss thresholds, independent of target category. The frequency domain sparsity of mixes and larger differences in target and mix roll-off points were positively correlated with performance especially for oHI participants (r = .3, p < .01). Performance of yNH on the other hand remained robust to changes in mix sparsity. Our findings underscore the multifaceted nature of selective listening in musical scenes and the instrument-specific consequences of spectral adjustments of the audio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.