Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792788›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025

Analyzing Atomic Interactions in Molecules as Learned by Neural Networks.

Malte Esders, Thomas Schnake, Jonas Lederer, Adil Kabylda, Grégoire Montavon, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Klaus-Robert Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Malte EsdersBIFOLD─Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9136-914X
Thomas SchnakeBIFOLD─Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Jonas LedererBIFOLD─Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Adil KabyldaDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, L-1511 Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Grégoire MontavonBIFOLD─Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Alexandre TkatchenkoDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, L-1511 Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-1012-4854
Klaus-Robert MüllerBIFOLD─Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, 10587 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While machine learning (ML) models have been able to achieve unprecedented accuracies across various prediction tasks in quantum chemistry, it is now apparent that accuracy on a test set alone is not a guarantee for robust chemical modeling such as stable molecular dynamics (MD). To go beyond accuracy, we use explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques to develop a general analysis framework for atomic interactions and apply it to the SchNet and PaiNN neural network models. We compare these interactions with a set of fundamental chemical principles to understand how well the models have learned the underlying physicochemical concepts from the data. We focus on the strength of the interactions for different atomic species, how predictions for intensive and extensive quantum molecular properties are made, and analyze the decay and many-body nature of the interactions with interatomic distance. Models that deviate too far from known physical principles produce unstable MD trajectories, even when they have very high energy and force prediction accuracy. We also suggest further improvements to the ML architectures to better account for the polynomial decay of atomic interactions.

Identifiers

PMID39792788
PMCPMC11780731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.