Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792624›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025

Semi-Supervised Learning Allows for Improved Segmentation With Reduced Annotations of Brain Metastases Using Multicenter MRI Data.

Jon André Ottesen, Elizabeth Tong, Kyrre Eeg Emblem, Anna Latysheva, Greg Zaharchuk, Atle Bjørnerud, Endre Grøvik

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jon André OttesenComputational Radiology and Artificial Intelligence (CRAI) Research Group, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5383-2439
Elizabeth TongDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9550-8178
Kyrre Eeg EmblemDepartment of Physics and Computational Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anna LatyshevaDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Greg ZaharchukDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5781-8848
Atle BjørnerudComputational Radiology and Artificial Intelligence (CRAI) Research Group, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Endre GrøvikDepartment of Radiology, Ålesund Hospital, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9925-1162

Funding

European Research Council 758657-ImPRESSHelse Sør-Øst RHF 2013069Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2016102Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2017073Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2021031Kreftforeningen 3434180Kreftforeningen 6817564Norges Forskningsråd 261984Norges Forskningsråd 325971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning-based segmentation of brain metastases relies on large amounts of fully annotated data by domain experts. Semi-supervised learning offers potential efficient methods to improve model performance without excessive annotation burden. PURPOSE: This work tests the viability of semi-supervision for brain metastases segmentation. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: There were 156, 65, 324, and 200 labeled scans from four institutions and 519 unlabeled scans from a single institution. All subjects included in the study had diagnosed with brain metastases. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: 1.5 T and 3 T, 2D and 3D T1-weighted pre- and post-contrast, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). ASSESSMENT: Three semi-supervision methods (mean teacher, cross-pseudo supervision, and interpolation consistency training) were adapted with the U-Net architecture. The three semi-supervised methods were compared to their respective supervised baseline on the full and half-sized training. STATISTICAL TESTS: Evaluation was performed on a multinational test set from four different institutions using 5-fold cross-validation. Method performance was evaluated by the following: the number of false-positive predictions, the number of true positive predictions, the 95th Hausdorff distance, and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Significance was tested using a paired samples t test for a single fold, and across all folds within a given cohort.

resultsSemi-supervision outperformed the supervised baseline for all sites with the best-performing semi-supervised method achieved an on average DSC improvement of 6.3% ± 1.6%, 8.2% ± 3.8%, 8.6% ± 2.6%, and 15.4% ± 1.4%, when trained on half the dataset and 3.6% ± 0.7%, 2.0% ± 1.5%, 1.8% ± 5.7%, and 4.7% ± 1.7%, compared to the supervised baseline on four test cohorts. In addition, in three of four datasets, the semi-supervised training produced equal or better results than the supervised models trained on twice the labeled data. DATA

conclusionSemi-supervised learning allows for improved segmentation performance over the supervised baseline, and the improvement was particularly notable for independent external test sets when trained on small amounts of labeled data. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Artificial intelligence requires extensive datasets with large amounts of annotated data from medical experts which can be difficult to acquire due to the large workload. To compensate for this, it is possible to utilize large amounts of un-annotated clinical data in addition to annotated data. However, this method has not been widely tested for the most common intracranial brain tumor, brain metastases. This study shows that this approach allows for data efficient deep learning models across multiple institutions with different clinical protocols and scanners. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsBrainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesbrain metastasesdeep learningsegmentationsemi‐supervised

Identifiers

PMID39792624
PMCPMC12063759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.