Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2025
Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain and N-Terminal Domain mRNA Vaccine.
Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05137236 (A Phase 2A, Randomized, Stratified, Observer-Blind Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of mRNA-1283 Vaccine Boosters for SARS-CoV-2), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2A, Randomized, Stratified, Observer-Blind Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of mRNA-1283 Vaccine Boosters for SARS-CoV-2
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell-Mediated Immunity of mRNA-1283 Vaccine Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding and N-Terminal Domains in Preclinical and Clinical Studies.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Bioengineering strategies for improving the immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Potent and dose-sparing next-generation SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, mRNA-1283, induces polyfunctional and durable T cell immunity.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Article
- Beyond the Pandemic Era: Recent Advances and Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Against Emerging Variants of Concern.Vaccines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundmRNA-1283 is an investigational coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine encoding the receptor-binding and N-terminal domains of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein in contrast to the original mRNA-1273 vaccine, which encodes the full-length spike protein.
methodsA phase 2a, dose-ranging, observer-blind, randomized study conducted in adults (aged ≥18 years) previously vaccinated with mRNA-1273 evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of mRNA-1283 (2.5, 5, and 10 µg) and its bivalent formulation, mRNA-1283.211 (5 and 10 µg; encoding original SARS-CoV-2 and Beta) against the comparator mRNA-1273 vaccine, 50 µg (part A). A subsequent, open-label study (part B) evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a monovalent Omicron BA.1 vaccine, mRNA-1283.529 (5 and 10 µg).
resultsA total of 340 participants were randomized in part A, and 200 participants were enrolled in part B. All dose levels of mRNA-1283 vaccines were well tolerated and increased the neutralizing antibody (nAb) responses at day 29 compared to baseline against SARS-CoV-2 D614G and Beta. The nAb responses elicited by mRNA-1283 were higher than those elicited by mRNA-1273. mRNA-1283.529 (part B) increased nAb at day 29 against Omicron BA.1. Antibody responses remained detectable for a year postvaccination.
conclusionsmRNA-1283 was well tolerated and exhibited improved immunogenicity compared to mRNA-1273. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT05137236.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.