Observational studyJAMA network open2025
Radon Exposure and Gestational Diabetes.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations ofBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Updated Knowledge on Radon Exposure: Quantification Methods, Health Effects, and Molecular Mechanisms.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Assessing historical residential radon exposure using a glass-based surface trap method in low radon level areas: a pilot study.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Understanding environmental risk factors for gestational diabetes (GD) is crucial for developing preventive strategies and improving pregnancy outcomes. Objective: To examine the association of county-level radon exposure with GD risk in pregnant individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, population-based cohort study used data from the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nuMoM2b) cohort, which recruited nulliparous pregnant participants from 8 US clinical centers between October 2010 and September 2013. Participants who had pregestational diabetes or were missing data on GD or county-level radon measurements were excluded from the current study. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to January 2024. Exposures: County-level radon data were created by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory based on the Environmental Protection Agency's short- and long-term indoor home radon assessments. Radon exposure was categorized into 3 groups: less than 1, 1 to less than 2, and 2 or more picocuries (pCi)/L (to convert to becquerels per cubic meter, multiply by 37). Because radon, smoking, and fine particulate matter air pollutants (PM2.5) may share similar biological pathways, participants were categorized by joint classifications of radon level (<2 and ≥2 pCi/L) with smoking status (never smokers and ever smokers) and radon level with PM2.5 level (above or below the median). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was GD, identified based on glucose tolerance testing and information from medical record abstraction. Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the association between radon exposure and GD. Results: Among the 9107 participants, mean (SD) age was 27.0 (5.6) years; 3782 of 9101 (41.6%) had ever used tobacco. The mean (SD) county-level radon concentration was 1.6 (0.9) pCi/L, and 382 participants (4.2%) had GD recorded. After adjusting for potential confounders, individuals living in counties with the highest radon level (≥2 pCi/L) had higher odds of developing GD compared with those living in counties with the lowest radon level (<1 pCi/L) (odds ratio [OR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.02-1.84); after additional adjustment for PM2.5, the OR was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.00-1.86). Elevated odds of GD were also observed in ever smokers living in counties with a higher (≥2 pCi/L) radon level (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.41-3.11) and participants living in counties with higher radon and PM2.5 levels (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.31-2.83), though no statistically significant interactions were observed. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study suggests that higher radon exposure is associated with greater odds of GD in nulliparous pregnant individuals. Further studies are needed to confirm the results and elucidate the underlying mechanisms, especially with individual-level residential radon exposure assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.