Observational studyJAMA network open2025
Variations and Opportunities in Postnatal Management of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study Design of the Global Prospective Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn Registry (GERANIUM).American journal of perinatology · 2026Article
- Characterization of the clinical course of early-onset severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Understanding the consequences of being RhD immunized during pregnancy 10 years after introduction of targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis: A retrospective nationwide cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Severe Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus Treated with Serial Intrauterine Transfusions: A Case Report and Review of Current Management.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Red blood cell alloimmunization and pregnancy: Diagnosis and management.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
67 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Preventive efforts in pregnancy-related alloimmunization have considerably decreased the prevalence of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). International studies are therefore essential to obtain a deeper understanding of the postnatal management and outcomes of HDFN. Taken together with numerous treatment options, large practice variations among centers may exist. Objectives: To assess variations in postnatal management and outcomes of HDFN among international centers and to identify opportunities to improve care. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this international, retrospective, cohort study, 31 expert centers from 22 countries retrieved data on neonates with HDFN managed between January 1, 2006, and July 1, 2021. Statistical analysis was performed from July 19, 2023, to October 28, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes included the frequency of exchange transfusions, administration of intravenous immunoglobulin, administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and red blood cell transfusions, as well as the association of gestational age at birth with exchange transfusion frequency and risk factors for adverse neonatal outcomes. Results: The study included 1855 neonates (median gestational age at birth, 36.4 weeks [IQR, 35.0-37.3 weeks]; 1034 boys [55.7%]), of whom 1017 (54.8%) received any form of antenatal treatment. Most neonates (1447 [78.0%]) had anti-D antibodies. Exchange transfusions were performed in 436 neonates (23.5%), with proportions in exchange transfusion frequency varying from 0% to 78% among centers. Intravenous immunoglobulin was administered to 429 of 1743 neonates (24.6%), with proportions varying from 0% to 100% among centers. A higher gestational age at birth was associated with a reduction in exchange transfusion frequency in neonates with intrauterine transfusion, decreasing from approximately 38.2% (13 of 34) at 34 weeks to 16.8% (18 of 107) after 37 weeks and 0 days. A weekly increase in gestational age at birth was associated with a 43.3% decrease (95% CI, 36.1%-49.7%) in the likelihood of adverse neonatal outcomes, and neonates who received an exchange transfusion were 1.55 (95% CI, 1.10-2.18) times more likely to experience unfavorable outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of neonates with HDFN managed at 31 centers in 22 countries, significant practice variations in the postnatal management of HDFN were identified, highlighting the lack of, and need for, consensus. The study suggests that there is a potential beneficial clinical association of waiting for delivery until after 37 weeks and 0 days with frequency of exchange transfusions among neonates with HDFN. The framework to implement international guidelines is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.