Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792300›Full record

ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2025

Harmonized technical standard test methods for quality evaluation of medical fluorescence endoscopic imaging systems.

Bodong Liu, Zhaojun Guo, Pengfei Yang, Jian'an Ye, Kunshan He, Shen Gao, Chongwei Chi, Yu An, Jie Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bodong Liu *Center for Medical Device Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, 100081, China.
Zhaojun Guo *Center for Medical Device Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, 100081, China.
Pengfei Yang *Center for Medical Device Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, 100081, China.
Jian'an Ye *School of Engineering Medicine and School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Kunshan HeThe Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China, Beijing, 100191, China.
Shen GaoCenter for Medical Device Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, 100081, China.
Chongwei ChiThe Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China, Beijing, 100191, China. chongwei.chi@ia.ac.cn.
Yu AnSchool of Engineering Medicine and School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China. yuan1989@buaa.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3113-7259
Jie TianSchool of Engineering Medicine and School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China. tian@ieee.org.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant 2023YFC3402800Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality L232097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence endoscopy technology utilizes a light source of a specific wavelength to excite the fluorescence signals of biological tissues. This capability is extremely valuable for the early detection and precise diagnosis of pathological changes. Identifying a suitable experimental approach and metric for objectively and quantitatively assessing the imaging quality of fluorescence endoscopy is imperative to enhance the image evaluation criteria of fluorescence imaging technology. In this study, we propose a new set of standards for fluorescence endoscopy technology to evaluate the optical performance and image quality of fluorescence imaging objectively and quantitatively. This comprehensive set of standards encompasses fluorescence test models and imaging quality assessment protocols to ensure that the performance of fluorescence endoscopy systems meets the required standards. In addition, it aims to enhance the accuracy and uniformity of the results by standardizing testing procedures. The formulation of pivotal metrics and testing methodologies is anticipated to facilitate direct quantitative comparisons of the performance of fluorescence endoscopy devices. This advancement is expected to foster the harmonization of clinical and preclinical evaluations using fluorescence endoscopy imaging systems, thereby improving diagnostic precision and efficiency.

Indexed as

Fluorescence endoscopyImage evaluationNear-infraredStandardization

Identifiers

PMID39792300
PMCPMC11723869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.