ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025
Influence of radiotherapy on cardiac implantable devices and leads-a single-institution analysis and critical evaluation of current guidelines.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Technical aspects of SBRT for therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia: a systematic review for radiation oncologists.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Quantifying three-dimensional displacement of cardiac implantable electronic devices and implications for safety margins in radiotherapy.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Cardiac implantable electronic devices and radiation therapy: long-term outcomes.European heart journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIncreasing life expectancy and advances in cancer treatment will lead to more patients needing both radiation therapy (RT) and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). CIEDs, including pacemakers and defibrillators, are essential for managing cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure. Telemetric monitoring of CIEDs checks battery status, lead function, settings, and diagnostic data, thereby identifying software deviations or damage. This study evaluates the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO)/German Society for Cardiology (DGK) guideline, assessing real-world complications and risk factors and analyzing pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead function for their predictive value concerning device malfunction.
methodsA total of 54 patients with pacemakers or ICDs who underwent radiation therapy were identified. Demographics, treatment courses, and device information from physical and digital records were extracted. DEGRO/DGK risk groups and pacemaker dependency at the start of RT were assessed. Delineation of the devices and lead insertion sites was performed in the treatment planning system. Dosimetric information from the treatment plans was then correlated with reports of standardized device checks.
resultsOver 80% of patients were treated with dual-chamber pacemakers or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and 16.7% had ICDs. One third of patients were pacemaker dependent. 59.3% of patients were in the low-risk category, 29.3% in the medium-risk, and 11.1% in the high-risk category. Thoracic irradiation resulted in the highest median dose to devices. Lead parameter deviations exceeding thresholds were found in 14.8% for the stimulation threshold and 13.5% for sensing. Device malfunctions occurred in 3.7% of cases, both involving electrical resets and neutron-producing radiation (beam energy 10 megaelectron volt (MV) or higher).
conclusionCollecting lead parameters in addition to secure malfunctions like electrical restarts and memory erasure revealed a significant proportion of treatment courses with temporary changes, though no correlation with individual treatment plans or adverse events was found. The focus on reducing neutron-producing radiation could be further supported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.