Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792260›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

Predicting acute and late toxicity in prostate cancer stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: the role of dosimetric parameters and prostate volume.

Gokhan Ozyigit, Pervin Hurmuz, Pantea Bayatfard, Burak Tilki, Yagiz Yedekci, Melek Tugce Yilmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Intermediate rectal dose is associated with late toxicity after prostate SBRT: a dose-volume histogram principal component analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. How do you handle post-radiotherapy follow-up care? Results of a national pattern-of-care study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gokhan OzyigitDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. gozyigit@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-7497-4348
Pervin HurmuzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1221-9192
Pantea BayatfardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Burak TilkiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Yagiz YedekciDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Melek Tugce YilmazDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-9286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur objective was to identify the dosimetric parameters and prostate volume that most accurately predict the incidence of acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity in prostate cancer stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) treatments.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 122 patients who received SABR for prostate cancer at our clinic between March 2018 and September 2022 using a five-fraction SABR regimen. The existing plans of these patients were re-evaluated according to our institutional protocols (Hacettepe University [HU-1] and HU-2) as well as PACE‑B, RTOG 0938, and NRG GU005 dose-volume constraints. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

resultsThe median follow-up was 24.7 months (0.8-94.4 months). For acute GU toxicity, moderate-dose regions were predictive for grade 1-2 toxicity, while high-dose regions were more associated with grade 3-4 toxicity. For late GU toxicity, moderate-high-dose regions were predictive. For GI toxicity, moderate-dose regions were important for both acute and late toxicity. The HU protocol encompassed all significant dosimetric factors influencing toxicity outcomes. A prostate volume threshold of 60 cc was predictive of acute grade 3-4 GU toxicity.

conclusionOur study highlighted the critical role of moderate-dose regions for acute and late GI and GU toxicity. Prostate treatment plans should be rigorously evaluated, and moderate doses should be minimized. The HU protocol is an eligible choice for five-fraction SABR plans.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizeRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesDosimetryProstate cancerProstate volumeSABRToxicity

Identifiers

PMID39792260
PMCPMC12283893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.