ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Spontaneous craniocervical dissection].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
performanceSpontaneous dissections of the cerebral arteries are among the leading causes of stroke in young adults. They result from hemorrhage into the outer layers of the arterial wall, which can lead to stenosis or even complete vessel occlusion. Clinical presentations vary, ranging from localized pain to cerebral ischemic complications. Early recognition of dissection warning signs and diagnosis through imaging is crucial due to the high risk of recurrent transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke within the first two weeks following a dissection, necessitating immediate therapeutic or prophylactic intervention. ACHIEVEMENTS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice, as it can reliably visualize all characteristic features of dissection. Typically, thin-slice, fat-saturated 3D black-blood sequences are sufficient to detect the pathognomonic intramural hematoma. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Acute treatment and secondary prevention depend on the extent of neurological deficits, the location and size of the dissection, any sequelae, concomitant pathologies, and risk factors. In most cases, spontaneous vascular recanalization or regression of vessel stenosis occurs within several months due to resorption of the mural hematoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39792242What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.