Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792162›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Automated classification of coronary LEsions fRom coronary computed Tomography angiography scans with an updated deep learning model: ALERT study.

Victor A Verpalen, Casper F Coerkamp, José P S Henriques, Ivana Isgum, R Nils Planken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victor A VerpalenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Casper F CoerkampDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
José P S HenriquesDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivana IsgumDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R Nils PlankenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.n.planken@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3940-4670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe use of deep learning models for quantitative measurements on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may reduce inter-reader variability and increase efficiency in clinical reporting. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of a recently updated deep learning model (CorEx-2.0) for quantifying coronary stenosis, compared separately with two expert CCTA readers as references.

methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 50 patients that underwent CCTA to rule out obstructive coronary artery disease between 2017-2022. Two expert CCTA readers and CorEx-2.0 independently assessed all 150 vessels using Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS). Inter-reader agreement analysis and diagnostic performance of CorEx-2.0, compared with each expert reader as references, were evaluated using percent agreement, Cohen's kappa for the binary CAD-RADS classification (CAD-RADS 0-3 versus 4-5) at patient level, and linearly weighted kappa for the 6-group CAD-RADS classification at vessel level.

resultsOverall, 50 patients and 150 vessels were evaluated. Inter-reader agreement using the binary classification at patient level was 91.8% (45/49) with a Cohen's kappa of 0.80. For the 6-group classification at vessel level, inter-reader agreement was 67.6% (100/148) with a linearly weighted kappa of 0.77. CorEx-2.0 showed 100% sensitivity for detecting CAD-RADS ≥ 4 and kappa values of 0.86 versus both readers using the binary classification at patient level. For the 6-group classification at vessel level, CorEx-2.0 demonstrated weighted kappa values of 0.71 versus reader 1 and 0.73 versus reader 2.

conclusionCorEx-2.0 identified all patients with severe stenosis (CAD-RADS ≥ 4) compared with expert readers and approached expert reader performance at vessel level (weighted kappa > 0.70). KEY POINTS: Question Can deep learning models improve objectivity in coronary stenosis grading and reporting as coronary CT angiography (CTA) workloads rise? Findings The deep learning model (CorEx-2.0) identified all patients with severe stenoses when compared with expert readers and approached expert reader performance at vessel level. Clinical relevance CorEx-2.0 is a reliable tool for identifying patients with severe stenoses (≥ 70%), underscoring the potential of using this deep learning model to prioritize coronary CTA reading by flagging patients at risk of severe obstructive coronary artery disease.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisDeep LearningRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceCoronary artery diseaseCoronary computed tomography angiographyDeep learningInter-reader variability

Identifiers

PMID39792162
PMCPMC11836176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.