Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792085›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Free Energy of Membrane Pore Formation and Stability from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Timothée Rivel, Denys Biriukov, Ivo Kabelka, Robert Vácha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothée RivelCentral European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Denys BiriukovCentral European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1007-2203
Ivo KabelkaCentral European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Robert VáchaCentral European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7610-658X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the molecular mechanisms of pore formation is crucial for elucidating fundamental biological processes and developing therapeutic strategies, such as the design of drug delivery systems and antimicrobial agents. Although experimental methods can provide valuable information, they often lack the temporal and spatial resolution necessary to fully capture the dynamic stages of pore formation. In this study, we present two novel collective variables (CVs) designed to characterize membrane pore behavior, particularly its energetics, through molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The first CV─termed Full-Path─effectively tracks both the nucleation and expansion phases of pore formation. The second CV─called Rapid─is tailored to accurately assess pore expansion in the limit of large pores, providing quick and reliable method for evaluating membrane line tension under various conditions. Our results clearly demonstrate that the line tension predictions from both our CVs are in excellent agreement. Moreover, these predictions align qualitatively with available experimental data. Specifically, they reflect higher line tension of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-

Indexed as

Cell MembraneLipid BilayersMolecular Dynamics SimulationThermodynamicsPhosphatidylcholinesPorosity1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholineLipid BilayersPhosphatidylcholines

Identifiers

PMID39792085
PMCPMC11776052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.