SynthesisBJS open2024
Organ-specific malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection: epidemiological meta-analysis of incidence rates.
Synthesis in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Incidence and risk factors of acute kidney injury following Stanford type A aortic dissection surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Surgical strategies in elderly patients with acute type A aortic dissection-a systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Nationwide trends in outcomes and resource utilization in surgically treated acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Impact of Malperfusion Burden on Early Outcomes After Surgery for Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: A Retrospective, Single-Center Investigation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Recurrent Pneumothorax With Extensive Subcutaneous Emphysema During the Perioperative Course of Type A Aortic Dissection: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Admission creatinine level predicts postoperative acute hepatic dysfunction in patients aged ≤30 years with acute type A aortic dissection: a multi-center retrospective study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Return to Work Status and Influencing Factors Among Young and Middle-Aged Patients with Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection After Cardiac Surgery: A Random Forest Model Analysis.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- When the Aorta Deceives: A Type A Dissection Case Masquerading as Limb Ischemia and Fecal Incontinence.Cureus · 2025Article
- Acute Type A Aortic Dissection With Compartment Syndrome.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning Model for Identifying the Risk of Mesenteric Malperfusion in Acute Aortic Dissection Using Initial Diagnostic Data: Algorithm Development and Validation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Platelet-to-white blood cell ratio as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection: a single-center retrospective analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute type A aortic dissection is a life-threatening clinical emergency that necessitates immediate surgical intervention with an estimated mortality rate of approximately 1-2% per hour. When complicated by malperfusion, the perioperative mortality rate is reported to be increased by up to 39%. Malperfusion can affect many vascular beds with varying incidence and severity, resulting in coronary, cerebral, visceral, peripheral, renal or spinal malperfusion. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the epidemiology of specific types of organ malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection and to analyse the impact on the survival outcomes associated with each malperfusion type.
methodsElectronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase were searched through to September 2024 to identify original studies that presented data on the incidence and the survival outcome of organ malperfusion in association with acute type A aortic dissection. The extracted data included patient characteristics and incidence of organ-specific malperfusion. Primary outcomes were the respective in-hospital mortality rate associated with each organ-specific malperfusion and a proportional meta-analysis was conducted to pool results. Quality assessment was performed using the modified National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for single-arm observational studies.
resultsA total of 40 studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 35 361 patients. Peripheral limb malperfusion was the most prevalent with a pooled incidence of 12% (95% c.i. 10 to 14). This was followed by lower limb or iliofemoral with 11% (95% c.i. 9 to 14). Spinal malperfusion was the lowest with 1% (95% c.i. 1 to 2). The pooled mortality rate with organ malperfusion varied between 18 and 36%. Within this population the highest mortality rate was associated with mesenteric malperfusion with 36% (95% c.i. 28 to 45). Following this the highest mortality rate was found with coronary at 33% (95% c.i. 26 to 40) and cerebral at 28% (95% c.i. 24 to 33) malperfusion.
conclusionSurvival during hospital admission after acute type A aortic dissection can vary depending on the presence and type of malperfusion, with mesenteric, coronary and cerebral malperfusion being associated with the highest in-hospital mortality rates. Organ-specific malperfusion syndromes should be considered when assessing the perioperative risk and surgical planning of patients undergoing surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.