Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792052›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2024

Organ-specific malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection: epidemiological meta-analysis of incidence rates.

Ashwini Chandiramani, Mohammed Al-Tawil, Assem Elleithy, Sahil Kakar, Tharun Rajasekar, Abinash Panda, Haytham Sabry, Assad Haneya, Amer Harky

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ashwini ChandiramaniDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Mohammed Al-TawilFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0003-2111-8596
Assem ElleithyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK.
Sahil KakarDepartment of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tharun RajasekarLiverpool Medical School, Liverpool, UK.
Abinash PandaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Haytham SabryDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Assad HaneyaDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Heart Center Trier, Trier, Germany.
Amer HarkyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute type A aortic dissection is a life-threatening clinical emergency that necessitates immediate surgical intervention with an estimated mortality rate of approximately 1-2% per hour. When complicated by malperfusion, the perioperative mortality rate is reported to be increased by up to 39%. Malperfusion can affect many vascular beds with varying incidence and severity, resulting in coronary, cerebral, visceral, peripheral, renal or spinal malperfusion. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the epidemiology of specific types of organ malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection and to analyse the impact on the survival outcomes associated with each malperfusion type.

methodsElectronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase were searched through to September 2024 to identify original studies that presented data on the incidence and the survival outcome of organ malperfusion in association with acute type A aortic dissection. The extracted data included patient characteristics and incidence of organ-specific malperfusion. Primary outcomes were the respective in-hospital mortality rate associated with each organ-specific malperfusion and a proportional meta-analysis was conducted to pool results. Quality assessment was performed using the modified National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for single-arm observational studies.

resultsA total of 40 studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 35 361 patients. Peripheral limb malperfusion was the most prevalent with a pooled incidence of 12% (95% c.i. 10 to 14). This was followed by lower limb or iliofemoral with 11% (95% c.i. 9 to 14). Spinal malperfusion was the lowest with 1% (95% c.i. 1 to 2). The pooled mortality rate with organ malperfusion varied between 18 and 36%. Within this population the highest mortality rate was associated with mesenteric malperfusion with 36% (95% c.i. 28 to 45). Following this the highest mortality rate was found with coronary at 33% (95% c.i. 26 to 40) and cerebral at 28% (95% c.i. 24 to 33) malperfusion.

conclusionSurvival during hospital admission after acute type A aortic dissection can vary depending on the presence and type of malperfusion, with mesenteric, coronary and cerebral malperfusion being associated with the highest in-hospital mortality rates. Organ-specific malperfusion syndromes should be considered when assessing the perioperative risk and surgical planning of patients undergoing surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionHospital MortalityAcute DiseaseAortic AneurysmHumansIncidence

Identifiers

PMID39792052
PMCPMC11720173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.