Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792001›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Mapping patterns of thought onto brain activity during movie-watching.

Raven Star Wallace, Bronte Mckeown, Ian Goodall-Halliwell, Louis Chitiz, Philippe Forest, Theodoros Karapanagiotidis, Bridget Mulholland, Adam Turnbull, Tamara Vanderwal, Samyogita Hardikar and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Movie Features Are Hierarchically Encoded in the Dynamics of Functional Connectivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Behavioral, experiential, and physiological signatures of mind blanking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Raven Star WallaceDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0414-0254
Bronte MckeownDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Ian Goodall-HalliwellDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Louis ChitizDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Philippe ForestMathematical and Electrical Engineering Department, IMT Atlantique, Brest, France.
Theodoros KarapanagiotidisSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Bridget MulhollandDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Adam TurnbullDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Tamara VanderwalFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Samyogita HardikarDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4380-5055
Tirso R J Gonzalez AlamSchool of Psychology and Sport Science, Bangor University, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4510-2441
Boris C BernhardtMontreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9256-6041
Hao-Ting WangCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Will StrawsonSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Michael MilhamChild Mind Institute, New York, United States.
Ting XuChild Mind Institute, New York, United States.
Daniel S MarguliesIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, University of Paris, Paris, France.
Giulia L PoerioSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth JefferiesDivision of Psychology & Language Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jeremy I SkipperInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5503-764X
Jeffrey D WammesDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8923-5441
Robert LeechDepartment of Neuroimaging at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5801-6318
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7298-2459

Funding

An Alignment Framework For Mapping Brain Dynamics and Substrates of Human Cognition Across SpeciesRF1MH128696 · NIMH · CHILD MIND INSTITUTE, INC. · PI XU, TING · 2021 to 2021
$1.2M
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada #RGPIN 2023-03496NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH128696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Movie-watching is a central aspect of our lives and an important paradigm for understanding the brain mechanisms behind cognition as it occurs in daily life. Contemporary views of ongoing thought argue that the ability to make sense of events in the 'here and now' depend on the neural processing of incoming sensory information by auditory and visual cortex, which are kept in check by systems in association cortex. However, we currently lack an understanding of how patterns of ongoing thoughts map onto the different brain systems when we watch a film, partly because methods of sampling experience disrupt the dynamics of brain activity and the experience of movie-watching. Our study established a novel method for mapping thought patterns onto the brain activity that occurs at different moments of a film, which does not disrupt the time course of brain activity or the movie-watching experience. We found moments when experience sampling highlighted engagement with multi-sensory features of the film or highlighted thoughts with episodic features, regions of sensory cortex were more active and subsequent memory for events in the movie was better-on the other hand, periods of intrusive distraction emerged when activity in regions of association cortex within the frontoparietal system was reduced. These results highlight the critical role sensory systems play in the multi-modal experience of movie-watching and provide evidence for the role of association cortex in reducing distraction when we watch films.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingMotion PicturesAdultCognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleThinkingVisual PerceptionYoung Adultexperience samplingfMRIhumannaturalistic stimulineuroscience

Identifiers

PMID39792001
PMCPMC11723579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.