ArticleJournal of comparative effectiveness research2025
Access in all areas? A roundup of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 6.
Article in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rigorous, transparent and inconclusive: what Europe's first joint clinical assessment reveals about a framework trying to serve everyone.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Review
- R WE ready for reimbursement? A round-up of developments in real-world evidence relating to health technology assessment: part 28.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Access in all areas? A round-up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: first Joint Clinical Assessment report released.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Access in all areas? A round-up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 10.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
- Access in all areas? A round up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 9.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
- Access in all areas? A round up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 7.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this update, we discuss an article covering the implementation challenges of the upcoming European Union Health Technology Assessment regulation, particularly focusing on the complexity of population, intervention, comparator and outcomes requirements across member states; a user guide to applying generalized cost-effectiveness analysis for broader value assessment and finally highlight an ongoing debate surrounding National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's severity modifier implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.