ArticleMedical care2025
Characteristics and Readmission Risks Following Sepsis Discharges to Home.
Article in Medical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the characteristics and risk factors associated with 30-day readmissions, including the impact of home health care (HHC), among older sepsis survivors transitioning from hospital to home. RESEARCH
designRetrospective cohort study of the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV data (2008-2019), using generalized estimating equations (GEE) models adjusting for patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. SUBJECTS: Sepsis admission episodes with in-hospital stays, aged over 65, and discharged home with or without HHC were included. MEASURES: The outcome was all-cause hospital readmission within 30 days following sepsis hospitalization. Covariates, including the primary predictor (HHC vs. Home discharges), were collected during hospital stays.
resultsAmong 9115 sepsis admissions involving 6822 patients discharged home (66.8% HHC, 33.2% Home), HHC patients, compared with those discharged without services, were older, had more comorbidities, longer hospital stays, more prior hospitalizations, more intensive care unit admissions, and higher rates of septic shock diagnoses. Despite higher illness severity in the HHC discharges, both groups had high 30-day readmission rates (30.2% HHC, 25.2% Home). GEE analyses revealed 14% higher odds of 30-day readmission for HHC discharges after adjusting for risk factors (aOR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02-1.27; P=0.02).
conclusionsHHC discharges experienced higher 30-day readmission rates than those without, indicating the need for specialized care in HHC settings for sepsis survivors due to their complex health care needs. Attention to sepsis survivors, regardless of HHC receipt, is crucial given the high readmission rates in both groups. Further research is needed to optimize postacute care/interventions for older sepsis survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.