Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39791626›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Unity in Diversity and Diversity in Unity-Vaccination Policies in EU Countries.

Elisaveta Petrova-Geretto, Alexandrina Vodenitcharova, Guenka Petrova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisaveta Petrova-GerettoDepartment of Bioethics, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University-Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-4067-761X
Alexandrina VodenitcharovaDepartment of Bioethics, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University-Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Guenka PetrovaDepartment of Organization and Economy of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University-Sofia, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-8116-5138

Funding

European Union Next-Generation EU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria BG-RRP2.004-0004-C01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThis article emphasizes the comprehensive importance of vaccination, exploring its role in disease prevention, addressing growing concerns around vaccine hesitancy, and underscoring the crucial need for high vaccination coverage rates.

methodsOur review examines EU-level and national policies on vaccination, utilizing EU sources, with a specific focus on regulatory and policy documents. Vaccination calendars in the EU were reviewed through the ECDC Vaccine Scheduler webpage. The parameters of this literature review were further selected in collaboration with an Emory Health sciences librarian using the following search terms: healthcare providers, communication, public health, informed consent, and bioethics.

resultsThe analysis of limited articles on community engagement, moral and political philosophy, and public health ethics informs the ethical consideration of informed consent in public health interventions. Countries exhibit varying relationships between their vaccination programs and society, with technocratic and populist influences shaping vaccination policies.

conclusionsEurope demonstrates diversity in vaccination policies, with availability, funding, and scheduling reflecting distinct approaches to vaccination.

Indexed as

ethicsEuropean countriesEuropean Unionpolicyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID39791626
PMCPMC11720550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.