Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39791451›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2024

Reflections on using Talanoa methodology to engage with Pacific youth in Aotearoa New Zealand about their sexual and reproductive health.

Radilaite Cammock, Tengihia Pousini, Malcolm Andrews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Radilaite CammockProject Lead, "Let's talk about it! Project"; Principal Investigator, School of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Studies, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6416-9583
Tengihia PousiniResearcher Associate, "Let's talk about it! Project"; Project Manager, School of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Studies, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Malcolm AndrewsResearcher Associate, "Let's talk about it! Project"; Research Officer, School of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Studies, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pacific understandings of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) encompass beliefs and practices reflective of Pacific values systems. These are integral to cultural understandings of safety, relationships, and intimacy. Research processes and practices that appropriately address these values and sensitivities are scarcely available in the literature, leading to limited use and understanding of culturally appropriate methods and procedures. Pacific methodologies like Talanoa are useful in ensuring that cultural perspectives unique to Pacific youth are addressed and appropriately represented in the research. This paper describes how cultural factors associated with sexual and reproductive health influenced the Talanoa research processes in a study of Pacific youth and SRH education. Key cultural considerations are discussed focussing on the positionality of the researchers, cultural sensitivities and protocols, communication strategies and the role of flexibility in privileging Pacific youth voices.

Indexed as

Reproductive HealthSexual HealthAdolescentFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleNew ZealandSex EducationSexual BehaviorYoung AdultPacific sexual cultural sensitivitiesPacific youth sexual and reproductive healthsexual and reproductive health educationsexual taboosTalanoa methods

Identifiers

PMID39791451
PMCPMC11834769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.