Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39791253›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Measuring Self-Reported Well-Being of Physicians Using the Well-Being Thermometer: Cohort Study.

Marios Adamou, Sarah L Jones, Niki Kyriakidou, Andrew Mooney, Shriti Pattani, Matthew Roycroft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marios AdamouUniversity of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4303-664X
Sarah L JonesSouth West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Belle Isle Health Park, Wakefield, WF1 5PN, United Kingdom, 44 1924 316492.ORCID 0000-0002-8438-4034
Niki KyriakidouLeeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6320-5239
Andrew MooneyRenal Unit, St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5676-6801
Shriti PattaniLondon North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9869-3815
Matthew RoycroftSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-0747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advancements in medical science have focused largely on patient care, often overlooking the well-being of health care professionals (HCPs). This oversight has consequences; not only are HCPs prone to mental and physical health challenges, but the quality of patient care may also endure as a result. Such concerns are also exacerbated by unprecedented crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to other sectors, HCPs report high incidence of stress, depression, and suicide, among other challenging factors that have a significant negative impact on their well-being. Objective: Given these substantial concerns, the development of a tool specifically designed to be used in clinical settings to measure the well-being of HCPs is essential. Methods: A United Kingdom-based cross-sectional pilot study was carried out to measure self-reported well-being in a cohort of 148 physicians, using the newly developed well-being thermometer. The aim of the tool is to allow respondents to develop an individual sense of "well-being intelligence" thus supporting HCPs to have better insight and control over their well-being and allow insights into how to manage it. The tool consists of 5 well-being domains-health, thoughts, emotions, spiritual, and social. Each domain can be measured individually or combined to produce an overall well-being score. Results: The tool demonstrated good internal consistency; the Cronbach α in this study was 0.84 for the total scale. Conclusions: Results from this cohort demonstrated that the well-being thermometer can be used to gather intelligence of staff well-being. This is a promising new tool that will assist HCPs to recognize their own well-being needs and allow health care organizations to facilitate change in policies and practices to reflect a better understanding of staff well-being.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansSelf ReportAdultCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsUnited Kingdomhealth carehealth care professionalsmental healthwell-beingwell-being thermometer

Identifiers

PMID39791253
PMCPMC11737351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.