ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Faecal microbiota transplantation for patients with diabetes type 1 and severe gastrointestinal neuropathy (FADIGAS): a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autologous fecal microbiota capsules are safe and potentially preserve beta-cell function in individuals with type 1 diabetes.Gut microbes · 2025Trial
- Repeated faecal microbiota transplantation for individuals with type 1 diabetes and gastroenteropathy.Diabetologia · 2025Trial
- Diet, gut microbiome, and type 1 diabetes: from risk to translational opportunity.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Distinct gut microbiota signatures and metabolic dysregulation in individuals with type 1 diabetes: insights into a microbiome-metabolite axis.Gut pathogens · 2025Article
- Unraveling Type 1 Diabetes: Integrating Microbiome, Metabolomics, and Immunomodulation for Next-Generation Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Intestinal Microbiota Modulation by Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- β-cell heterogeneity and molecular plasticity in type 2 diabetes: multi-omics perspectives and the role of gut microbiota.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic gastroenteropathy is associated with nausea, vomiting, bloating, pain, constipation, and diarrhoea. Current therapies are scarce. We tested faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for patients with type 1 diabetes and gastroenteropathy. Methods: In a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot trial, adults with type 1 diabetes and moderate-to-severe gastrointestinal symptoms were randomised (1:1) to encapsulated FMT or placebo. Each patient received around 25 capsules containing 50 g of faeces, administered in a single dose. The placebo capsules contained glycerol, saline and food colouring. All patients received FMT as a second intervention. The primary endpoint was number of adverse events of severity grade 2 or more assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events during the week following the first intervention. Secondary endpoints included gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life assessed four weeks after treatment. Public trial registration, ClinicalTrials.govNCT04749030. Findings: We randomised 20 patients to FMT or placebo. Following this intervention, 26 adverse events of grade 2 or more occurred. Four patients in the FMT group reported seven adverse events, and five patients in the placebo group reported 19, with no differences between the groups. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhoea, bloating, and abdominal pain. No serious adverse events were related to the treatment. Patients who received FMT reduced their median Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-Irritable Bowel Syndrome score from 58 (IQR 54-65) to 35 (32-48), whereas patients receiving placebo reduced their score from 64 (55-70) to 56 (50-77) (p = 0.01). The Irritable Bowel Syndrome Impact Scale score improved from 108 (101-123) to 140 (124-161) with FMT and 77 (53-129) to 92 (54-142) with placebo (p = 0.02). The Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index declined from a median of 42 (28-47) to 25 (14-31) after FMT and 47 (31-69) to 41 (36-64) after placebo (p = 0.03). Interpretation: FMT was safe and improved clinical outcomes for patients with type 1 diabetes suffering from bowel symptoms. Funding: Steno Collaborative Grant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.