Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39791108›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Noninvasive respiratory support following extubation in critically ill adults with obesity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Joris Pensier, Arthur Naudet-Lasserre, Clément Monet, Mathieu Capdevila, Yassir Aarab, Inès Lakbar, Gérald Chanques, Nicolas Molinari, Audrey De Jong, Samir Jaber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Is postoperative ARDS different from medical ARDS?Critical care (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  10. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critical illness: A practice survey of intensivists in Australia and New Zealand.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joris PensierDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Arthur Naudet-LasserreDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Clément MonetDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Mathieu CapdevilaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Yassir AarabDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Inès LakbarDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Gérald ChanquesDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Nicolas MolinariMedical Information, IMAG, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Audrey De JongDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Samir JaberDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with obesity are at high-risk of extubation failure. Discrepancies were found in the results of recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the roles of noninvasive ventilation (NIV), high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) to prevent extubation failure in critically ill patients with obesity. Methods: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science from 1 January 1998 to 1 July 2024 for RCTs evaluating noninvasive respiratory support therapies (NIV, HFNC, COT, NIV + HFNC) after extubation in critically ill adults with obesity. Primary outcome was reintubation at day 7. Secondary outcome was 28-day mortality. We generated pooled risk ratios (RR) and numbers needed to treat (NNT). We rated risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42022308995). Findings: In seven RCTs including 1933 patients, NIV + HFNC (RR 0.36 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16-0.82], NNT = 10 [95% CI 7-33]) and NIV (RR 0.45 [95% CI 0.23-0.88], NNT = 11 [95% CI 8-50]) but not HFNC (RR 0.79 [95% CI 0.40-1.59]) reduced reintubation at day 7, compared to COT. Compared to HFNC, NIV + HFNC (RR 0.46 [95% CI 0.23-0.90], NNT = 14 [95% CI 10-77]) but not NIV (RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.32-1.02]) reduced reintubation at day 7. Compared to HFNC, both NIV (RR 0.31 [95% CI 0.13-0.74], NNT = 15 [95% CI 12-40]) and NIV + HFNC (RR 0.30 [95% CI 0.10-0.89], NNT = 15 [95% CI 11-90]) reduced 28-day mortality. Interpretation: The results suggest that compared to COT and HFNC, NIV alone or with HFNC reduces reintubation in critically ill patients with obesity after extubation. Compared to HFNC, NIV alone or with HFNC reduces mortality. The number needed to treat with NIV or NIV + HFNC to avoid one death was 15. These findings support the application of NIV to mitigate extubation failure in critically ill adults with obesity. Funding: None.

Indexed as

BIPAPCPAPHFNOHigh-flow nasal cannula oxygenICUNoninvasive ventilationObesity

Identifiers

PMID39791108
PMCPMC11715126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.