ArticleCureus2024
Fluid Management in Critical Care: New Insights Into Optimal Fluid Therapy.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Balanced crystalloid versus saline for resuscitation in adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Balancing Chloride and Glucose in Critical Illness: A 10 Year Study on Diluent Strategies and ICU Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFluid management is a crucial critical care component, influencing outcomes such as organ function, renal integrity, and survival in critically ill patients. Recent evidence suggests that balanced crystalloids may offer advantages over isotonic saline, particularly in reducing the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and other complications. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of balanced crystalloids versus isotonic saline on clinical outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU), focusing on AKI, renal replacement therapy (RRT), and mortality. The study also assessed the role of fluid restriction in specific patient populations, including those with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, and heart failure.
methodsA retrospective cohort study included 600 adult patients admitted to the ICU who received fluid therapy between January 2023 and January 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the type of fluid received: 300 patients received balanced crystalloids and 300 received isotonic saline. Outcomes of interest included the incidence of AKI, the need for RRT, overall ICU mortality, oxygenation status (PaO
resultsThe incidence of AKI was significantly lower in the balanced crystalloids group (12% vs. 22%, p = 0.01), with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.50 (95% CI 0.32-0.78, p = 0.002). The need for RRT was also reduced (8% vs. 15%, p = 0.03), with an adjusted OR of 0.55 (95% CI 0.30-0.95, p = 0.03). Although ICU mortality was lower in the balanced crystalloids group (18% vs. 24%), this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). Subgroup analysis showed that in ARDS patients, fluid restriction combined with balanced crystalloids improved oxygenation (PaO
conclusionBalanced crystalloids are associated with a significant reduction in AKI incidence and RRT requirement compared to isotonic saline. Fluid restriction, particularly when combined with balanced crystalloids, improves clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS, sepsis, and heart failure. These findings support the preferential use of balanced crystalloids in critically ill patients and highlight the importance of individualized fluid management strategies in the ICU. Further research is needed to confirm these benefits and optimize fluid therapy protocols in diverse ICU populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.