Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39791079›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Duplication of the Plantaris Tendon and Its Clinical Significance: A Case Report.

José Araújo, Nuno Pais, António Andrade

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José AraújoOrthopedics and Traumatology, Unidade Local de Saúde do Nordeste, Macedo de Cavaleiros, PRT.
Nuno PaisOrthopedics and Sports Medicine, Clínica Espregueira-Mendes, Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) Medical Center of Excellence, Porto, PRT.
António AndradeOrthopedics and Traumatology, Unidade Local de Saúde do Nordeste, Macedo de Cavaleiros, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plantaris tendon may be absent in some individuals, indicating its unclear function. Anatomically, the plantaris tendon originates from the lateral femoral condyle and has a variable course and insertion point at the calcaneal tuberosity. The plantaris tendon may influence conditions such as Achilles tendinopathy, particularly in its midportion, whether by its close relation to the calcaneal tendon or adhesions between both tendons. This case study involves a 38-year-old male patient with an Achilles tendon rupture; two plantaris tendons were discovered during surgical exploration. An anatomical variation was described before in a cadaveric study, where two plantaris muscles were encountered during specimen dissection, and the accessory tendon was inserted in the crural fascia proximal to the calcaneal tendon. The relationship between anatomical variations of the plantaris tendon and Achilles tendon injuries remains an area of ongoing research, and current findings suggest that while there may be a correlation, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. This case reports a rare anatomical variation encountered during routine surgery, and despite not establishing a relation to tendon rupture, it can alert other surgeons to the anatomic variability of the plantar tendon and its possible role in the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy.

Indexed as

achillesduplicationplantaristendinopathytendon

Identifiers

PMID39791079
PMCPMC11717443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.