ArticleCureus2024
The Assessment of TikTok as a Source of Quality Health Information on Human Papillomavirus: A Content Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prostate cancer research on social media platforms: a bibliometric and thematic analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Baloxavir marboxil-related information on Douyin and Xiaohongshu: a cross-sectional analysis of content, misinformation, and user engagement.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about cervical spondylosis on TikTok and Redbook: a cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing the quality and reliability of health information on GLP-1 receptor agonists on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional analysis of the public health infodemic.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Understanding TikTok's Role in Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Awareness and Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Quality, Reliability and Accuracy of Hyperthyroidism-Related Content on Social Media Platform TikTok.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2025Article
- Instagram Posts Promoting Colorectal Cancer Awareness: Content Analysis of Themes and Engagement During Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Various studies have evaluated the quality of health-related information on TikTok (ByteDance Ltd., Beijing, China), including topics such as COVID-19, diabetes, varicoceles, bladder cancer, colorectal cancer, and others. However, there is a paucity of data on studies that examined TikTok as a source of quality health information on human papillomavirus (HPV). This study, therefore, evaluated the quality of health information on HPV on TikTok. Methods The terms "HPV" and "human papillomavirus" were searched on TikTok on a single day in August 2024, and 200 videos were retrieved. Relevant user metrics were collected for each video, including the number of likes, shares, and followers, the video length, and the uploader type. Two independent raters assessed each video regarding the completeness of six types of content (the definition of HPV, symptoms, risk factors, evaluation, management, and outcomes). Then, the two raters independently assessed the quality of information in the videos using the DISCERN instrument. Results Sixty-nine videos met inclusion criteria; 11 were created by general users, 44 by healthcare professionals, and 14 by organizations. Videos uploaded by general users and health professionals have a longer duration (p < 0.001) and more likes (p = 0.048) than those uploaded by organizations. More than 60% of the videos contained little or no content on the HPV content assessed. Although the reliability and quality of treatment choices were higher among videos uploaded by healthcare professionals, the overall quality of HPV health information using the DISCERN instrument was "very poor" (24.2 (±6.92)). Conclusions The overall quality of HPV videos uploaded on TikTok is very poor and not acceptable, thus failing to satisfy public health needs. Healthcare professionals must enhance their social media presence, produce reliable and substantive material, and collaborate with social media platforms and high-engagement accounts to facilitate users' access to high-quality data. TikTok users must recognize that material regarding HPV may lack medical accuracy and should consistently consult healthcare providers for medical guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.