Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39791044›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Mediation in Healthcare: Enhancing Conflict Resolution Between Patients and Physicians Beyond the Courtroom.

Kostadin Dimitrov, Tsonka Miteva-Katrandzhieva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early Clinical Mediation in End-of-Life Disputes: A Procedural Justice Analysis.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kostadin DimitrovSocial Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, BGR.
Tsonka Miteva-KatrandzhievaSocial Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, BGR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare is defined by rapidly advancing technologies and increased patient expectations, resulting in frequent disagreements between patients, their families, and medical practitioners. Historically, these conflicts have been settled through the adversarial court system, which frequently fails to produce equitable results due to unequal legal representation, procedural difficulties, and other shortcomings. This analysis investigates mediation, a type of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), as a viable option for addressing healthcare disputes. Mediation is a voluntary, flexible, and confidential process in which a neutral third party organizes negotiations to help conflicting parties reach an agreement. Unlike litigation, mediation promotes open communication, empathy, and the preservation of relationships, which enhances patient trust and satisfaction. Furthermore, mediation resolves disputes more quickly and cost-effectively than traditional court proceedings, significantly reducing the emotional and financial burdens on all parties involved. This review examines the benefits of mediation, focusing on its role in preserving physician-patient relationships, reducing legal costs, and improving overall healthcare outcomes. The use of mediation in healthcare conflict resolution provides a more effective, compassionate, and lasting resolution that benefits healthcare institutions, practitioners, and patients.

Indexed as

alternative dispute resolutionclinical conflict managementhealthcare conflict resolutionhealthcare mediationmediationmedical disputesphysician-patient communicationphysician-patient mediationphysician-patient relationship

Identifiers

PMID39791044
PMCPMC11717370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.