ArticleCureus2024
Popularity and Perceptions of Protein Supplementation: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Undergraduate University Students Aged 18 to 25 Years in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimYoung adults, particularly those aged 18-25, exhibit varying perceptions and choices regarding the use of protein supplements (PS). Understanding these perceptions can significantly enhance professional guidance and nutrition education for undergraduate students. This study, conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, aims to explore the perceptions of PS use and identify the most popular PS among university students. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive study involved young adults aged 18-25 of both genders. A validated online questionnaire was used to collect data, which was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, United States). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre (KAIMRC) approved the study protocol.
resultsA total of 740 participants (430 females (58.1%) and 310 males (41.9%)) were included in the study. Around 17% reported using PS, with males being the primary users (65 (51.6%)). Protein powder was the most popular protein supplement (48 (38.1%)), followed by a combination of protein powder, protein bars, and fortified foods (42 (33.3%)). Age, gender, and family income significantly influenced protein supplement use (p<0.05). Males preferred a combination of protein powder and fortified food. Significant gender differences were observed in the choice of protein supplement type (p=0.001). Perceptions of PS were influenced by friends, family, doctors, pharmacists, social media, and the internet. However, the majority of participants indicated a need for more awareness regarding PS.
conclusionThe study underscores the need for improved professional guidance and nutrition education for young adults, particularly in addressing misconceptions and gender differences in protein supplement use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.