ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025
Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Crohn's Perianal Fistula Treatment: Results From a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF) are difficult to manage and often require multiple interventions. This study aimed to assess the preferences of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) for attributes of CPF-related procedures/surgeries to better inform CPF management. Methods: This US cross-sectional, observational study was conducted via a web-enabled questionnaire (October 2021-January 2022) among patients aged 21-89 years with a self-reported physician diagnosis of CPF (with or without CPF-related surgery experience) and HCPs (gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons who managed ≥3 patients with CPF in the past 12 months). Patient and HCP preferences for CPF-related procedure/surgery attributes were assessed using a discrete choice experiment and stated preference methodology. Results: In total, 100 patients and 137 HCPs were recruited. Benefits of therapy (symptom control and/or fistula closure) were rated as the most important CPF treatment attribute by both patients and HCPs influencing treatment decisions (mean relative importance 23.9 and 36.3, respectively). The mean relative importance of procedure invasiveness and postoperative discomfort was higher for patients (19.3 and 20.2, respectively) than for HCPs (14.3 and 11.0, respectively), whereas the mean relative importance of fecal incontinence was greater for HCPs than patients (25.0 vs. 19.3, respectively). Conclusions: Patients and HCPs have different perspectives on the importance of specific CPF-related procedure/surgery attributes. The attributes identified as important to patients and HCPs in this study should be considered when managing patients with CPF and making treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.