ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2023
Chest X-ray Overuse in Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit per American College of Radiology Criteria.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal and geographical variations of chest x-rays: A ten-year register study from Norway.Acta radiologica open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A routine chest radiograph (CXR) is frequently incorporated into postoperative clinical pathways. Whereas prior studies evaluated CXR use for specific indications, overall CXR "stewardship" within cardiothoracic surgery remains undescribed. We characterized CXR use within a cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) and quantified X-ray-driven changes in patient management. Methods: All CXRs performed during 3 months in the cardiothoracic ICU of an academic 900-bed tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Attending radiologist CXR reports and clinical history from ordering providers were manually reviewed to classify CXRs as indicated or not indicated by American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria. Multiple resident-level providers further reviewed CXRs to determine whether the image demonstrated any actionable or unexpected findings. Results: Between October 1, 2021, and January 3, 2022, 1273 CXRs were performed on adult cardiac and general thoracic surgery patients; the most common indication was routine daily (55.9%), followed by support device monitoring (12.4%) and new ICU transfer (10.4%). Only 34.3% of performed CXRs met ACR Appropriateness Criteria; 65.7% did not ( Conclusions: CXRs are overused in the cardiothoracic ICU according to ACR Appropriateness Criteria. CXRs performed outside these guidelines have significantly fewer actionable or meaningful findings. Optimizing CXR use can improve resource utilization and efficiency in care of cardiothoracic surgical patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.