Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790932›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2024

A Tutorial on Indicating Responses and Their Importance in Mand Training.

Sarah E Frampton, Judah B Axe, Caleb R Davis, Olga Meleshkevich, Mei-Hua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improving Use of Social Communicative Gestures by Children with Autism.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Social validity as an interactive process.Journal of applied behavior analysis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah E FramptonUniversity of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9279-7998
Judah B AxeSimmons University, Boston, MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6182-2145
Caleb R DavisSimmons University, Boston, MA USA.
Olga MeleshkevichSimmons University, Boston, MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9510-0896
Mei-Hua LiSimmons University, Boston, MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0672-9340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most critical intervention strategies when working with individuals with significant language delays associated with autism spectrum disorder and related developmental delays is teaching mands. For mand training to be effective, an establishing operation (EO) must be in effect, yet EOs are often difficult to observe. Before learning to mand, an individual may point to or approach a reinforcer, which likely indicates an EO related to that reinforcer, and may be considered an indicating response (IR). Observing an IR before prompting a mand increases the likelihood that the prompt is delivered when an EO is in effect and that the response is truly a mand. Missing from the literature is a consistent definition of IRs and a robust set of guidelines for using them in practice. In this tutorial, we review the terms and topographies of IRs in the literature to arrive at a definition of IRs. We then provide practical, research-based recommendations for using IRs during mand training, as well as assessing, selecting, teaching, and replacing IRs. Last, we provide tools and resources related to decision making and data collection with respect to IRs. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-024-00965-7.

Indexed as

Abolishing operationEstablishing operationIndicating responseMandMand trainingMotivating operation

Identifiers

PMID39790932
PMCPMC11707099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.