Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790926›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2024

A Clinical Tutorial on Methods to Capture and Contrive Establishing Operations to Teach Mands.

Sarah E Frampton, Caleb R Davis, Olga Meleshkevich, Judah B Axe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah E FramptonPsychology Department, University of Nebraska-Omaha, 6001 Dodge Street, Omaha, NE 68182 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9279-7998
Caleb R DavisDepartment of Behavior Analysis, Simmons University, Boston, MA USA.
Olga MeleshkevichDepartment of Behavior Analysis, Simmons University, Boston, MA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9510-0896
Judah B AxeDepartment of Behavior Analysis, Simmons University, Boston, MA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6182-2145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mands are consistently described as critical learning targets for members of vulnerable populations in need of language intervention (Ala'i-Rosales et al., 2018; Michael, 1988; Sundberg, 2004). Reviews of the literature demonstrate a prevalence of the mand in the applied literature (e.g., DeSouza et al., 2017). Yet, gaps between research and practice exist in scientific fields resulting in decades-long delays between identification of evidence-based approaches and adoption in everyday use. The mand may be particularly at risk for procedural drift in practice settings given the sometimes elusive nature of establishing operations (EOs) and the relative complexity of procedures used to contrive them. Thus, the purpose of this tutorial is to build upon prior conceptual (e.g., Shafer, 1994) and applied (e.g., Cengher et al., 2022) reviews on mands to provide a contemporary, in-depth review of three procedures used to contrive EOs: incidental teaching, the interrupted chains procedure, and programmed restriction of reinforcers. Recent examples from the literature are discussed along with considerations for use in practice. Resources to support implementation including integrity checklists and role play scenarios are provided. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-024-00985-3.

Indexed as

Abolishing operationEstablishing operationMandMotivating operationTutorialVerbal behavior

Identifiers

PMID39790926
PMCPMC11706817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.