Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790918›Full record

ReviewBehavior analysis in practice2024

Building Collaborative Partnerships between Behavior Analysts and Families.

Stefan Horbanczuk, Angel Fettig, Adriana Luna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior analysis in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan HorbanczukUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.ORCID 0009-0008-0127-7905
Angel FettigUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Adriana LunaUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaboration practices have been utilized within applied behavior analysis (ABA) to build relationships among relevant stakeholders. A recent focus within the field of ABA highlights collaborative practices for behavior analysts to utilize in service delivery positions. However, myriad barriers, such as sources of funding and competing stakeholder interests, inhibit behavior analysts' ability to build collaborative partnerships with families. We describe the barriers behavior analysts face at the systemic, implementation, and training levels of service delivery and their potential impact on behavior analysts and the families with whom they work. We then highlight four fundamental tenets of building a collaborative partnership between behavior analysts and families, which incorporate collaborative strategies utilized in positive behavior support (PBS), family-centered practice (FCP), and ABA. We then offer practical recommendations to be used within the context of the current barriers that behavior analysts and families experience. These recommendations are precisely indicated to establish practices providing technically sound ABA services while continuing to deepen collaborative partnerships with families.

Indexed as

CollaborationContextual practiceFamiliesPartnerships

Identifiers

PMID39790918
PMCPMC11707203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.