Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790909›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2024

The Challenges Associated with

Katherine Pickard, Nailah Islam, Naomi Green, Emma Chatson, Jocelyn Kuhn, Rachel Yosick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine PickardDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Autism and Related Disabilities, Emory School of Medicine, 1920 Briarcliff Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3783-9753
Nailah IslamChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA.
Naomi GreenChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA.
Emma ChatsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Autism and Related Disabilities, Emory School of Medicine, 1920 Briarcliff Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA.
Jocelyn KuhnDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Autism and Related Disabilities, Emory School of Medicine, 1920 Briarcliff Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA.
Rachel YosickDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Autism and Related Disabilities, Emory School of Medicine, 1920 Briarcliff Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention (NDBI) supports early social communication skills in young autistic children. Given their emphasis on child-led learning opportunities, NDBI is thought to be a socially valid approach to autism early intervention. Applied behavior analysis (ABA) practices could be an ideal setting to increase access to NDBIs for young autistic children; however, current ABA services continue to rely primarily on structured and adult-led approaches to teaching, including discrete trial training (DTT), which have been criticized for their intensity, limitations in skill generalization, and possible harms. Thus, while there is growing interest in translating NDBI into ABA settings, delivering NDBI in these settings may require de-implementing or transitioning away from using DTT approaches with young autistic children. The current study sought to understand the perspectives of ABA providers on the use of NDBI strategies within ABA clinical settings and the factors impacting the transition away from DTT approaches to effectively integrate NDBI. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 ABA frontline and supervising clinicians across several ABA organizations. Rapid qualitative methods grounded in standard content analysis were used to analyze qualitative data. Results indicated that ABA clinicians generally viewed NDBI positively. However, several themes emerged related to the relative ease of using NDBI and DTT; the relative effectiveness of NDBI and DTT; client, caregiver, and staff perceptions of NDBI; and clinical decision-making around who might benefit from NDBI. Barriers to implementing NDBI included the need to unlearn existing DTT strategies, limited training and self-efficacy delivering NDBI, mixed attitudes toward NDBI, and broader systemic issues in the delivery of ABA services. Findings underscore the importance of understanding ABA frontline clinicians' perspectives regarding the implementation of NDBI and suggest the need for more targeted strategies to integrate NDBI strategies in ABA clinical settings. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-024-01011-2.

Indexed as

Applied behavior analysis (ABA)AutismDe-implementationEarly interventionNaturalistic developmental behavioral intervention (NDBI)

Identifiers

PMID39790909
PMCPMC11707165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.