Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790898›Full record

ArticleInnovations in clinical neuroscience

Patient Challenges in Utilization of Methadone to Treat Opioid Use Disorder and Perspectives on a Solution for Improved Security and Convenience in Take-home Dosing.

Eric Morse, Graeme Christianson, Melissa Olivadoti, John Timberlake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovations in clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric MorseDr. Morse is with Carolina Performance in Raleigh, North Carolina and Morse Clinics in Raleigh, North Carolina.
Graeme ChristiansonMr. Christianson is with 4C Research Group in Somerton, United Kingdom.
Melissa OlivadotiDr. Olivadoti is with Assisi Medical Affairs Consulting, LLC in Henderson, Nevada.
John TimberlakeMr. Timberlake is with Berkshire Biomedical Corporation in Dallas, Texas.

Funding

COPA, an Automated Medication Dispensing and Remote Management System for at Home Methadone Dispensing - Administrative SupplementR44DA057185 · NIDA · BERKSHIRE BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION · PI TIMBERLAKE, JOHN · 2022 to 2024
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R44 DA057185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methadone is commonly utilized to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Requirements to visit an opioid treatment provider (OTP) clinic for methadone treatment limits access to treatment, impacts quality of life, and reduces OUD treatment program retention. The Computerized Oral Prescription Administration (COPA) system is a dual-biometric dispensing device for take-home dosing that could reduce the impacts of methadone administration on patients and clinic staff. Objective: To identify challenges for patients treated with methadone for OUD and gain their perspectives on COPA. Methods: Adult patients treated with methadone at a single-site OTP clinic were recruited to complete a qualitative interview regarding their experience with methadone and the impact that expansion of take-home doses would have on their life. Participants were provided printed resources describing COPA and handled a COPA device before being asked for their perspectives. Results: Participants (n=12) were 58.33 percent male and 41.67 percent female, and had no take-home doses (n=5), 2 to 5 days of take-home doses (n=4), or six or more days of take-home doses (n=3). Most (91.67%) participants desired more take-home doses, and 66.7 percent stated more take-home doses would reduce the negative impact of OUD treatment on their ability to work. Average time and cost per trip to obtain their methadone dose at the clinic was 75 minutes and $36.58, respectively. Participants responded positively toward COPA. Participants with no take-home privileges would pay $126.88 per month to obtain take-home privileges by using COPA, and those with take-home privileges would pay $30.31 per month to keep the same level of take-home doses and $117.50 per month to expand their take-home doses using COPA. Conclusion: Participants endured a monetary and time burden to access their methadone treatment, and wished to have more take-home doses to reduce the frequency of their visits to the OTP clinic. Participants viewed take-home doses as having a positive impact on their ability to care for family members, hold a job, and travel, and they appreciated the key attributes of COPA and were willing to invest their own funds to gain access to the device. COPA is a potential solution to expand take-home methadone access to patients while ensuring safety, adherence, retention, and appropriate use.

Indexed as

Methadoneopioid treatment programopioid use disordertake-home dose

Identifiers

PMID39790898
PMCPMC11709438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.