ArticleInnovations in clinical neuroscience
Sociodemographic Factors and Consanguinity in Intellectual Disability: A Pilot Study.
Article in Innovations in clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Arab populations have a long tradition of consanguinity. In Morocco, consanguineous marriages are culturally favored. In this study, we assessed the effect of consanguinity on the occurrence of intellectual disability (ID) and investigated its association to education level and professional status in a series of Moroccan families. Design: In total, 186 patients with ID were included in this study. Data were processed and analyzed with the IBM SPSS. Results: The rate of consanguinity among the parents of children with ID was 34.95 percent. Marriages between first cousins accounted for 24.19 percent of consanguineous unions (FI=0.02). In the general population (n=300), 27.3 percent of marriages were consanguineous, with 22.66 percent being marriages between first cousins. Marriage between first cousins was the most common type of consanguineous marriage. The illiteracy rate was greater among women, compared to men (56.9% vs. 37.87%). The majority of mothers (81.11%) were housewives. A predominance of low professional status was observed among the men (62.22% of population, 22.7%). There was a high correlation between consanguinity and ID. The association between education level, professional status, and consanguinity rate in ID was not statistically significant ( Conclusion: The consanguinity rate in Moroccan families remains important. More strategies and efforts must be taken and reinforced for a better understanding and awareness of consanguinity risks to significantly reduce this practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39790896PMC11709441What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.