ArticleHeliyon2025
Optimization of cutting temperature and surface roughness in CNC turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy using response surface methodology.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-11-13Compromised Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the optimization of cutting conditions for machining titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), with the goal of minimizing tool-chip interface temperature and surface roughness. The research focuses on key cutting parameters to investigate the most effective combinations for enhancing surface finish and reducing thermal impact during machining. The present study deals with the dry turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with carbide alloy inserts in a way to utilize the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to develop predictive models for minimum surface roughness and optimum temperature. The findings reveal that both cutting speed and depth of cut are critical in determining machining outcomes. Specifically, a low cutting speed of 88 m/min coupled with a high depth of cut of 0.20 mm was found to elevate the cutting temperature to approximately 835 °C, resulting a surface roughness of 0.59 μm. Conversely, increasing the cutting speed to 120 m/min while reducing the depth of cut to 0.10 mm significantly lowered the temperature to around 607 °C, resulting a surface roughness of 0.19 μm; thus, thereby improving surface finish and reducing thermal stress on the tool. Additionally, a 27 % reduction in cutting temperature and a minimum surface roughness of 0.19 μm were achieved with optimal settings of 120 m/min cutting speed, 0.08 mm/rev feed rate, and 0.10 mm depth of cut. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of RSM in optimizing machining parameters for optimum temperature and better surface finish in the titanium alloy machining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.