Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790721›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Linking Functional Traits To Trophic Roles In Scavenger Assemblages.

Violeta Marie Montenegro, Patricia Mateo-Tomás, Jessica Schneider, Daisy H Dent, Tom Crowther, Carolina Bello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ravens (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Violeta Marie MontenegroDepartment of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zürich Switzerland.
Patricia Mateo-TomásBiodiversity Research Institute (University of Oviedo - CSIC - Principado de Asturias) Mieres Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-9514
Jessica SchneiderDepartment of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zürich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5120-8246
Daisy H DentDepartment of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zürich Switzerland.
Tom CrowtherDepartment of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zürich Switzerland.
Carolina BelloDepartment of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zürich Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scavenging is a widespread feeding strategy involving a diversity of taxa from different trophic levels, from apex predators to obligate scavengers. Scavenger species play a crucial role in ecosystem functioning by removing carcasses, recycling nutrients and preventing disease spread. Understanding the trophic roles of scavenger species can help identify specialized species with unique roles and species that may be more vulnerable to ecological changes. To identify species with specialized roles, we studied three scavenger networks (one in north temperate Spain and two in central-south Mediterranean Spain) that comprised 25 scavenger species (65% birds and 35% mammals), consuming carcasses of four wild ungulate species. We characterized the trophic role of a species by combining four species-level network metrics (normalized degree, specialization, closeness, and betweenness centrality) into a single centrality metric, quantifying how scavenger species interact with carcass species within their ecological network. Higher centrality indicates the species feeds on a greater variety of carcasses and may contribute more to carrion consumption than species with lower centrality, which have more peripheral and specialized roles. The griffon vulture (

Indexed as

carcassesfunctional traitsinteraction networksscavengersSpaintrophic role

Identifiers

PMID39790721
PMCPMC11711106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.