ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2023
Piglet Model for Modified Blalock-Taussig-Thomas Shunt Training.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunt is one of the milestone procedures in cardiac surgery and a crucial operation for palliating blue babies. It is currently impractical to train new surgeons on infants even under the supervision of their mentors. A realistic training model for location, exposure, tissue toughness, and texture is required. The objective of this study was to determine whether the model is realistic and practical and to evaluate the quality of anastomosis performed by surgical trainees. Methods: Piglet heart and lung models were selected from piglets of 3 to 5 kg. Six cardiothoracic surgical residents participated in the program and performed the procedure. Subsequently, every trainee answered a standard questionnaire in terms of satisfaction in reality and practicality; the trainers evaluated the quality of the anastomosis. The median score of each item was analyzed and described. The quality of anastomosis was evaluated and analyzed similarly. Results: Median scores of satisfaction (14 questions) were 9, 10, 9, 9.5, 10, 9.5, 10, 9.5, 10, 8.5, 10, 8.5, 10, and 8. Median challenge scores (6 questions) were 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 9.5, and 10. The median anastomosis evaluation score from 6 trainees was 25 (24-25). Conclusions: Our heart-lung simulation model is perhaps 1 of the most realistic simulations in practicality, visualization, exposure of the related structures, similar scenes to the real operation, and sense of touch and texture. Realistic models should be developed, but they should be inexpensive.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.