Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790658›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2023

Piglet Model for Modified Blalock-Taussig-Thomas Shunt Training.

Piya Samankatiwat, Montien Ngodngamthaweesuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Piya SamankatiwatDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Montien NgodngamthaweesukDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunt is one of the milestone procedures in cardiac surgery and a crucial operation for palliating blue babies. It is currently impractical to train new surgeons on infants even under the supervision of their mentors. A realistic training model for location, exposure, tissue toughness, and texture is required. The objective of this study was to determine whether the model is realistic and practical and to evaluate the quality of anastomosis performed by surgical trainees. Methods: Piglet heart and lung models were selected from piglets of 3 to 5 kg. Six cardiothoracic surgical residents participated in the program and performed the procedure. Subsequently, every trainee answered a standard questionnaire in terms of satisfaction in reality and practicality; the trainers evaluated the quality of the anastomosis. The median score of each item was analyzed and described. The quality of anastomosis was evaluated and analyzed similarly. Results: Median scores of satisfaction (14 questions) were 9, 10, 9, 9.5, 10, 9.5, 10, 9.5, 10, 8.5, 10, 8.5, 10, and 8. Median challenge scores (6 questions) were 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 9.5, and 10. The median anastomosis evaluation score from 6 trainees was 25 (24-25). Conclusions: Our heart-lung simulation model is perhaps 1 of the most realistic simulations in practicality, visualization, exposure of the related structures, similar scenes to the real operation, and sense of touch and texture. Realistic models should be developed, but they should be inexpensive.

Identifiers

PMID39790658
PMCPMC11708466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.