Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790632›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2024

Primary vs Staged Biventricular Repair for Neonatal IAA with VSD and LVOTO.

Joseph R Nellis, Jacob C Scherba, James M Meza, Joseph W Turek, Nicholas D Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph R NellisDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
Jacob C ScherbaDuke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
James M MezaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
Joseph W TurekDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
Nicholas D AndersenDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study sought to determine the safety of primary and staged biventricular repair in neonates with interrupted aortic arch (IAA), ventricular septal defect (VSD), and severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO). Methods: Patients with a fundamental diagnosis of IAA and VSD between 2015 and 2020 were extracted from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database by using a Participant User File. The objective was to compare outcomes for neonates undergoing primary and staged Yasui and Ross operations. Primary end points were operative morbidity and mortality. Results: During the study period, 11.4% (123 of 1079) of neonates with a fundamental diagnosis of IAA and VSD underwent operations indicative of severe LVOTO. Of these patients, 42 (34%) underwent primary biventricular repair (Yasui or Ross/Ross-Konno), and 81 underwent a potential staging procedure (Norwood or hybrid stage I). No differences were observed in preoperative patient characteristics between groups. Neonates undergoing staged repair experienced fewer major complications (0 vs 1; Conclusions: Primary and staged biventricular repairs for IAA and VSD with LVOTO are associated with low operative mortality in the modern era and may be favorable to long-term single-ventricle palliation.

Identifiers

PMID39790632
PMCPMC11708735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.