ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2024
Does Cardiac Function Improvement With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reduce All-Cause Mortality?
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally invasive cardiac surgery - coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- A contemporary review on heart failure with improved ejection fraction.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Successful use of pulsatile flow and goal directed perfusion in a high-risk patient.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2025Article
- The Role of Myocardial Revascularization in Ischemic Heart Failure in the Era of Modern Optimal Medical Therapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Surgical ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The effect of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on cardiac function improvement remains controversial. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that improvement in cardiac function after CABG does not improve life expectancy. This study aimed to examine whether CABG improved cardiac function and how this improvement influenced all-cause mortality and to compare patient prognosis according to preoperative cardiac function. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35% who underwent CABG between January 1994 and December 2022. We compared patients with and without cardiac function improvement, defined as an increase in LVEF of ≥10%, to identify associated factors and assess the impact on all-cause mortality. We also compared outcomes according to the degree of preoperative LV dysfunction. Results: Among the 166 patients included, 102 and 64 had a preoperative LVEF of 25%-35% and ≤25%, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 79.9 ± 72.3 months. We observed significant LVEF improvement, from 28% (range, 23.3%-35%) preoperatively to 39% (range, 31%-46%) at 13.1 months postoperatively. The 7-year survival rates were similar in the ejection fraction ≤25% and 25%-35% groups (80.2% vs 73.8%, Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CABG may enhance cardiac function in more than half of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, with a correlation to improved all-cause mortality. Moreover, LVEF improvement after CABG is associated with an improved prognosis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.